How much did A HAROLD & LUCILE WEBER CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of A HAROLD & LUCILE WEBER CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

men

2023

men

2024

mendress successsuccess michiana

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k10 grants · $17k
$10k–50k2 grants · $30k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$15,044
St Mary's College$15,044
100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER SOUTH BEND$2,100
Food Bank of Northern Indiana$2,000
Youth Service Bureau$2,000
La Casa De Amistad$2,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS MICHIANA INC$2,000
MICHIANA LEADERSHIP CENTER$2,000
South Bend Symphony Orchestra$1,500
Heroes Camp$1,500
South Bend Museum of Art$1,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS MICHIANA INC$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$308k · 14 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$308k

$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%

-28%

Still filing today

71%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FB
Food Bank of Northern Indiana
7× · 2018–2024 · $15k · revenue +148%
HC
Heroes Camp
7× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue +105%
SB
South Bend Symphony Orchestra
7× · 2018–2024 · $13k · revenue +23%

Funded once

YS
YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF
one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -28%
II
INTERACTION INITIATIVE INC
one grant, 2018 · $2k
DO
DAUGHTERS OF DESTINY
one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Downtown South Bend Inc Foundation

The organization is committed to the advancement and vitality of downtown south bend through offering business resources, support, initiatives, and incentives; presenting marketing and events to attract visitors; and highlighting downtown…

Philanthropy

Downtown South Bend Inc

Downtown south bend, inc. is committed to the advancement and vitality of downtown through offering business resources, support, initiatives, and incentives; presenting marketing and events to attract visitors; and highlighting downtown as…

—

Small Business Association of Michigan

The small business association of michigan's mission is to help michigan small businesses succeed.

—

Michiana Partnership Inc

The south bend - elkhart regional partnership focuses on a long-term systemic approach to advance the region's economy by aligning the efforts of various stakeholders around five key areas: educating a world-class workforce, recruiting and…

Community Improvement

Boys and Girls Club of the

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development

South Bend Montessori High

We exist to meet the developmental needs of adolescents by educating high school students through the montessori method in a mixed-income, community-oriented environment.

Education

Ywca of Bucks County

Eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, & dignity for all.

Human Services

Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

—

Near Northwest Neighborhood Inc

To improve the physical, social and economic environment of the near north-west section of the city of south bend, indiana.

—

United Way of South Central Michigan

United way of south central michigan strives for caring, connected, equitable communities.

Philanthropy

St Joseph Missions Inc

To provide emergency shelter and resources for single homeless women, regardless of their faith, in an environment that respects their dignity as human persons, affords them the opportunity to live indivdiually and collectively with others…

Philanthropy

South Bend Empowerment Zone Inc

The empowerment zone nurtures the mind, body, and spirit of each child by embracing equity, learning, and change for students, staff, and families. we harness the power of community and relationships to ignite transformation.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Joseph County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Heroes Camp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

10/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$250,647Arts & Culture$17,500Food & Nutrition$14,600Youth Development$13,500Civil Rights$7,100Employment$6,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of St Joseph County IncIN22.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · 1st Source Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Fields Foundation Irr Tua · The Specialized Staffing Charitable · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Asante Foundation Inc · Hayes Family Foundation Inc · Memorial Hospital of South Bend Inc · United Way of St Joseph County Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation A HAROLD & LUCILE WEBER CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DRESS FOR SUCCESS MICHIANA INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832280997 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DRESS FOR SUCCESS MICHIANA INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to A Harold & Lucile Weber Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to A Harold & Lucile Weber Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

A HAROLD & LUCILE WEBER CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to A Harold & Lucile Weber Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

A HAROLD & LUCILE WEBER CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to A Harold & Lucile Weber Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph