Loading…
· Private foundation
A CONCRETE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$267k
Granted FY2025
12
Grants
7
Communities
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
0164% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Education$300kHuman Services$70kFood & Nutrition$65kHealth$55kPublic Benefit$50kRecreation & Sports$30kPhilanthropy$20kAnimals$20kOther$342k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
2025
prayercharlottesvillechurch
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- 24-7 PRAYER$52,190
- VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$50,000
- NORTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$25,000
- 24-7 PRAYER$25,000
- SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$25,000
- VENTURE$20,000
- PINK UMBRELLA THEATER COMPANY$15,000
- CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE SPCA$15,000
- VETERAN BUSHIDO BROTHERHOOD$15,000
- CITY CHURCH IN CHARLOTTESVILLE$10,000
- LOV INC$10,000
- THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE$5,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$470k · 6 repeat orgs$482k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
13
Total granted
$470k
$310k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+42%
+70%
Still filing today
83%
54%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue -2%- VPVIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK2× · 2020–2023 · $65k · revenue +6%
- NCNORTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH3× · 2020–2025 · $50k
Funded once
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +2884%- TATHE A21 CAMPAIGN INCone grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +65%
- GBGREEN BERET FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +119%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Justice Ventures International
Jvis mission is to bring freedom, justice, and restoration to men, women, and children suffering from human trafficking and other extreme injustice by partnering with local organizations and global stakeholders.
International
2
People Incorporated of Virginia
To provide opportunities for economically disadvantaged people to reach their goals in order to enhance their lives, their families, and their communities.
—
3
Safe Passage Inc
Safe passage is dedicated to creating a world free of domestic violence and relationship abuse. we support survivors and their families, engange our community, and advocate for systemic change.
—
4
Social Venture Partners Boston Inc
Svp boston, a group of diverse, highly skilled professionals, collaborates with carefully selected boston area non-profits by investing their time, skills, and money to increase the capacity of these non-profits to deliver meaningful…
Philanthropy
5
Witness Inc
Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. the organization operates globally. witness' global team designs solutions, provides guidance, and co-develops strategies that enable human rights defenders…
International
6
Transitions Family Violence Services
The mission of transitions family violence services (tfvs) is to build safe and healthy families on the virginia peninsula by providing services to adult and child victims of domestic violence and human trafficking. we work to increase…
—
7
Secure Diversity Inc
Addressing the cyber security talent shortage
Education
8
United States Veterans Initiative
The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the (see sch. o) provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.
Human Services
9
Voices for Virginia's Children
The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.
Civil Rights
10
Treasured Vessels Foundation
Treasured vessles foundation is devoted to providing a long-term safe place for healing and growth to individuals impacted by trauma from exploitation in sex trafficking.
Human Services
11
Usvets - Texas
The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.
Human Services
12
Silicon Valley Defense Working Group Co
Silicon Valley Defense Group convenes experts in technology, investment, and government for discussions on how to better collaborate between the various groups. The comments and topics are then published on our website to help educate and…
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philanthropy Roundtable and the most unlike its peers is Virginia Tech Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$382,190Education$300,000Human Services$70,000Food & Nutrition$65,000Health$55,000Public Benefit$50,000Recreation & Sports$30,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS ↗
- Who funds HOPE IS EVERYTHING INC ↗
- Who funds THE A21 CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds VETERAN BUSHIDO BROTHERHOOD ↗
- Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds VENTURE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
- Who funds PINK UMBRELLA THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
American Endowment FoundationOH8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation A CONCRETE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VETERAN BUSHIDO BROTHERHOOD.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 863315469 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on VETERAN BUSHIDO BROTHERHOOD, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 32% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to A Concrete Christian Foundation?
Find your warmest path to A Concrete Christian Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines