Skip to content
A Child's Hope Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

A Child's Hope Foundation

A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION elevates how the world cares for orphans and vulnerable children.

$739k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$892kInternational$350kCommunity Improvement$19kReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$7k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $228,298, the rows itemized in this filing. The $739,298 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $511,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
$21,970
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANCHO DE LOS NINOS$88,798
ONE GENERATION ALLIANCE (RANCHO LA HERMOSA)$46,173
ESPERE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER$29,600
92HANDS$21,970
CORAZON DE VIDA$12,993
HOME FOR ORPHANS OF MEXICAN EXTRACTION INC NDA NINOS DE BAJA$10,968
ONE HEART BULGARIA$9,948
GHANA MAKE A DIFFERENCE (GMAD)$7,848
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $799k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RANCHO DE LOS NINOS: $159k → 15%ONE HEART BULGARIA: $66k → 12%RANCHO DE LOS NINOS: $93k → 15%ONE HEART BULGARIA: $30k → 12%CORAZON DE VIDA: $62k → 10%RANCHO DE LOS NINOS: $89k → 15%ONE HEART BULGARIA: $10k → 12%CORAZON DE VIDA: $57k → 10%RANCHO DE LOS NINOS: $62k → 15%CORAZON DE VIDA: $36k → 10%RANCHO DE LOS NINOS: $55k → 15%CORAZON DE VIDA: $35k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $32k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $478k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$340k · 71% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE SUPPORT

Sub-Saharan Africa$78k · 16% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PARTNERS WHO SUPPORT CHILDREN'S HOMES

Middle East and North Africa$34k · 7% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE SUPPORT

Central America and the Caribbean$27k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of A Child's Hope Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 14%.

A Child's Hope Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 44% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$1.2M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+114%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    Rancho De Los Ninos
    5× · 2018–2024 · $458k · revenue +234% · 67% of their budget
  • CD
    CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $235k · revenue +33%
  • OG
    ONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $212k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • BO
    BUILDERS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • MF
    Malouf Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -84%
  • OL
    OAK LIFE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa de Angeles Foundation
Human Services
2
Zion Orphan Home
—
3
Orphans Hope International
—
4
Mexico Orphan Missions Inc
International
5
Baja Vision Ministries

Our mission is to build homes for poor families in tijuana mexico as well as to operate an orphanage called city of angels also in tijuana

Housing & Shelter
6
Eden Garden Orphanage

Eden Garden Orphanage cares for orphans in and from the country of Haiti, preventing the otherwise likely outcome of an early death due to malnutrition or disease and /or a life of prostitution or crime.

—
7
Project Renewed Hope Inc

Support of Orphaned, Displaced or Abandoned children.

Human Services
8
Hogar Infantil Inc

Our mission is to help at-risk youth in the city of Tijuana, MX by supporting Casa Hogar La Gloria, an orphanage where children receive quality education, psychological attention, as well as a safe and secure environment in which to…

Philanthropy
9
Casa Mami Mx

Support an orphange in Reynosa, Mexico to give orphans hope and a future.

Human Services
10
Josiahs House

Oversee housing, education and needs of orphaned/foster children in the Dominican Republic who have been placed in the care of Josiah's House and live in housing provided by Josiah's House.

International
11
Hogar De La Promesa

Promise Home orphanage provides for the needs of the abused, abandoned, and neglected of Honduras. Including food, shelter, and training.

International
12
Hogar De Los Ninos
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Generation Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Malouf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rancho De Los Ninos: $458,089 · Human ServicesRancho De Los NinosCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $235,235 · Human ServicesCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATIONONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION: $106,123 · Human ServicesONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATIONONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC: $211,696 · InternationalONE GENERATION ALLIAN…Ghana Make a Difference: $20,192 · InternationalGhana Make a Differen…HOMES FOR ORPHANS OF MEXICAN EXTRACTION INC: $10,968 · InternationalESPERE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER A UTAH NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $104,441 · OtherESPERE COMM…BUILDERS OF HOPE: $20,499 · OtherBUILDERS OF…FAMILY WORSHIP CENTER: $6,849 · OtherNEW AFRICA INC: $38,903 · EducationDoor of Faith Ministries Inc: $25,830 · Community ImprovementRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $18,250 · Crime & LegalMalouf Foundation: $11,254 · PhilanthropyOAK LIFE INC: $9,558 · Religion
Human Services$799,447International$242,856Other$131,789Education$38,903Community Improvement$25,830Crime & Legal$18,250Philanthropy$11,254Religion$9,558

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRancho De Los Ninos: $458,089 over 5y, 67% of budgetCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $235,235 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC: $211,696 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION: $106,123 over 3y, 25% of budgetESPERE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER A UTAH NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $104,441 over 4y, 38% of budgetNEW AFRICA INC: $38,903 over 2y, 16% of budgetDoor of Faith Ministries Inc: $25,830 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGhana Make a Difference: $20,192 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $18,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMalouf Foundation: $11,254 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHOMES FOR ORPHANS OF MEXICAN EXTRACTION INC: $10,968 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A Child's Hope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A Child's Hope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A Child's Hope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home