· Public charity
A Child's Hope Foundation
A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION elevates how the world cares for orphans and vulnerable children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $228,298 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $739,298 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $511,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RANCHO DE LOS NINOS | $88,798 |
| ONE GENERATION ALLIANCE (RANCHO LA HERMOSA) | $46,173 |
| ESPERE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER | $29,600 |
| 92HANDS | $21,970 |
| CORAZON DE VIDA | $12,993 |
| HOME FOR ORPHANS OF MEXICAN EXTRACTION INC NDA NINOS DE BAJA | $10,968 |
| ONE HEART BULGARIA | $9,948 |
| GHANA MAKE A DIFFERENCE (GMAD) | $7,848 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $799k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $478k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE SUPPORT
Stated purpose: PARTNERS WHO SUPPORT CHILDREN'S HOMES
Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE SUPPORT
Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 18% of A Child's Hope Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in UT; read by stated purpose it is 14% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RDRancho De Los Ninos5× · 2018–2024 · $458k · revenue +205% · 67% of their budget
- CDCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $235k · revenue +33%
- OGONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $212k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- BOBUILDERS OF HOPEone grant, 2022 · $20k
- MFMalouf Foundationone grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -41%
- OLOAK LIFE INCone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to build homes for poor families in tijuana mexico as well as to operate an orphanage called city of angels also in tijuana
Support of Orphaned, Displaced or Abandoned children.
Eden Garden Orphanage cares for orphans in and from the country of Haiti, preventing the otherwise likely outcome of an early death due to malnutrition or disease and /or a life of prostitution or crime.
Support an orphange in Reynosa, Mexico to give orphans hope and a future.
Oversee housing, education and needs of orphaned/foster children in the Dominican Republic who have been placed in the care of Josiah's House and live in housing provided by Josiah's House.
Our mission is to help at-risk youth in the city of Tijuana, MX by supporting Casa Hogar La Gloria, an orphanage where children receive quality education, psychological attention, as well as a safe and secure environment in which to…
The organization provides housing medical care education and loving support for homeless children in peru. the home is located in arequipa peru. the organization houses approximately 50 children and assists children no longer residing at…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Generation Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Malouf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rancho De Los Ninos ↗
- Who funds CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ESPERE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER A UTAH NON PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds Door of Faith Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Ghana Make a Difference ↗
- Who funds RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Malouf Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR ORPHANS OF MEXICAN EXTRACTION INC ↗
- Who funds OAK LIFE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization A Child's Hope Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.