Skip to content

· Private foundation

A & L Edelman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$26kReligion$23kHealth$16kArts & Culture$13kEnvironment$5kInternational$4kEducation$3kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE$2,275
ISREAL TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATION$1,500
SAINT ANDREWS FUND$1,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$1,000
KRAVIS CENTER$1,000
MORICHES BAY PROJECT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$200
FRIENDS OF THE WESTHAMPTON AMB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
CO
MO
VA
DE
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 24% of A & L Edelman Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

A & L Edelman Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 11 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$58k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+50%

Still filing today

45%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +50%
  • RF
    RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +20%
  • DK
    DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • U
    URT
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • CO
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF LESS THAN 100 EACH
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • VP
    VIP PRIMARY CARE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
3
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health
4
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
5
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
6
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
7
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
8
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
Central Suffolk Hospital

Central suffolk hospital ("csh") d/b/a peconic bay medical center ("pbmc") is a not-for-profit hospital consisting of acute health care, a skilled nursing facility and a certified home care agency. csh provides a full range of health care…

Health
11
Plainview Hospital

Plainview hospital is part of northwell health, inc ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
12
Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Northern westchester hospital association is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care;…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Tennis Centers Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Moriches Bay Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS RECIPIENTS LESS THAN 1000 EACH: $13,069 · OtherVARIOUS RECIPIENTS LESS THAN 1000 EACHWESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE DONATION: $11,280 · OtherWESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE DONATIONWESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE: $6,151 · OtherWESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLEURT: $4,190 · OtherURTCONTRIBUTIONS OF LESS THAN 100 EACH: $3,495 · OtherCONTRIBUTIONS OF LESS THAN 100 EACHVIP PRIMARY CARE: $3,000 · OtherWHBPAC: $3,000 · OtherMORICHES BAY PROJECT CONTRIBAUTION: $3,000 · OtherWRT: $2,233 · Other+14 more: $11,936 · Other+14 moreNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $9,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWIS…THE BICOL CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $2,550 · HealthTHE BICOL CLIN…RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureRAYMOND F…WESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWESTHAMPT…LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLIGHTHOUS…JEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · PhilanthropyMORICHES BAY PROJECT INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC: $1,750 · EducationISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · International
Other$61,354Health$11,550Arts & Culture$8,000Philanthropy$6,000Environment$2,000Education$1,750International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BICOL CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $2,550 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMORICHES BAY PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BICOL CLINIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MORICHES BAY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A & L Edelman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A & L Edelman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lighthouse Artcenter Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to A & L Edelman Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to A & L Edelman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A & L Edelman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph