Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

826 National Inc

826 is the largest youth writing network in the country.

$469k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.7MYouth Development$377kArts & Culture$350k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $439,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $469,270 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,270 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $182k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $258k
$49,750
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
826 DC$69,000
826 MSP$69,000
826 New Orleans$69,000
826 NYC$50,500
826 Michigan$49,750
826 Boston$34,500
826 LA$34,250
826 Valencia$31,500
826 CHI$31,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%826 Boston: $55k → 16%826 MSP: $79k → 11%826 Valencia: $49k → 10%826 LA: $66k → 14%826 NYC: $81k → 20%UNT Dallas Foundation: $40k → 14%826 DC: $128k → 14%826 Michigan: $62k → 14%826 CHI: $97k → 14%Big Class: $60k → 23%826 Boston: $39k → 16%826 MSP: $73k → 11%826 Valencia: $43k → 10%826 LA: $57k → 14%826 NYC: $57k → 20%826 DC: $69k → 14%826 Michigan: $50k → 14%826 CHI: $74k → 14%826 New Orleans: $69k → 23%826 Boston: $37k → 16%826 MSP: $69k → 11%826 Valencia: $42k → 10%826 LA: $54k → 14%826 NYC: $51k → 20%826 DC: $42k → 14%826 Michigan: $50k → 14%826 CHI: $52k → 14%826 New Orleans: $65k → 23%826 Boston: $35k → 16%826 MSP: $60k → 11%826 LA: $44k → 14%826 NYC: $37k → 20%826 DC: $38k → 14%826 Michigan: $39k → 14%826 CHI: $38k → 14%826 New Orleans: $55k → 23%826 LA: $39k → 14%826 NYC: $37k → 20%826 DC: $37k → 14%826 Michigan: $35k → 14%826 CHI: $37k → 14%826 New Orleans: $37k → 23%826 LA: $35k → 14%826 NYC: $35k → 20%826 DC: $35k → 14%826 New Orleans: $35k → 23%826 DC: $35k → 14%826 New Orleans: $35k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
DC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$3.4M
$0

Still filing today

90%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 8I
    826DC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $446k · revenue +38%
  • 8
    826LA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $390k · revenue +17%
  • 8I
    826NYC Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $389k · revenue +32%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    826 National Inc

    826 is the largest youth writing network in the country. 826 National serves as the hub of the movement to amplify student voices and champions the belief that strong writing skills are essential for lifelong success. Founded in 2002, the…

    Education
    2
    LitShop

    LitShop provides after-school and summer programming that pairs engaging literacy opportunities with building and making. By intentionally creating a supportive space where girls and gender-expansive youth can take risks, explore…

    Education
    3
    Chapter 510 Ink

    Chapter 510 is a made-in-Oakland youth writing, bookmaking & publishing center. Our teaching artists and mentors work side by side with educators to provide a safe space and supportive community so Black, brown, & queer youth ages 8-19 can…

    Arts & Culture
    4
    Day Eight

    Day eight contributes to the healing of the world through the arts. our mission is to empower individuals and communities to participate in the arts through the production, publication, and promotion of creative projects.

    Arts & Culture
    5
    916 Ink

    916 ink empowers youth in sacramento through creative writing and literacy workshop, as well as tutoring, aimed at transforming them into proficient readers, confident communicators and published authors.

    Education
    6
    J3 Foundation
    Education
    7
    Uptown Stories Inc

    The organizations mission is to empower young people in upper manhattan to write their own stories.

    Education
    8
    Missoula Writing Collaborative

    We partner with schools and communities to teach the imaginative power of language. We embrace creativity, empowerment, inclusion, and excellence. We build communities of hope and compassion through writing.

    Arts & Culture
    9
    WriteBoston Inc

    See Statement O for description of programs and services.

    Education
    10
    Writing By Writers

    To create a rigorous, compassionate and inclusive environment to learn the art of reading and writing from accomplished authors.

    Education
    11
    Literary Freedom Project Inc

    The Literary Freedom Project creates free, open spaces for communities to engage with books through weekly discussions and presentations. Our programs promote literacy, celebrate the diverse cultures of the Bronx and NYC, and foster…

    Arts & Culture
    12
    Letters 2 Literacy
    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 826DC Inc and the most unlike its peers is 826 Boston Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    826 NEW ORLEANS — $419,492 · Education826 NEW ORLEANS826CHI INC — $417,037 · Education826CHI INC826LA — $390,216 · Education826LA826NYC Inc — $389,202 · Education826NYC Inc826 MSP — $346,066 · Education826 MSP826 BOSTON INC — $319,936 · Education826 BOSTON INC826 Valencia — $297,042 · Education826 Valencia826DC INC — $446,211 · Youth Development826DC INC826 MICHIGAN INC — $364,782 · Other826 MICHIGAN …UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS AT DALLAS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF…
    Education$2,578,991Youth Development$446,211Other$414,782

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget826DC INC — $446,211 over 9y, 18% of budget826 NEW ORLEANS — $419,492 over 9y, 21% of budget826CHI INC — $417,037 over 9y, 11% of budget826LA — $390,216 over 9y, 3.4% of budget826NYC Inc — $389,202 over 9y, 5.1% of budget826 MICHIGAN INC — $364,782 over 9y, 9.3% of budget826 MSP — $346,066 over 6y, 17% of budget826 BOSTON INC — $319,936 over 9y, 3.3% of budget826 Valencia — $297,042 over 8y, 1.2% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds 826DC INC
    • Who funds 826 NEW ORLEANS
    • Who funds 826CHI INC
    • Who funds 826LA
    • Who funds 826NYC Inc
    • Who funds 826 MICHIGAN INC
    • Who funds 826 MSP
    • Who funds 826 BOSTON INC
    • Who funds 826 Valencia

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Hawkins ProjectMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Hawkins Project · The Apatow-Mann Family Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization 826 National Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
    • 826 Boston Inc1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph