· Public charity
The Hawkins Project
THE HAWKINS PROJECT encourages curiosity, awakens joy, and celebrates individuality.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $230,640 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $251,659 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,019 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $121k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MCSWEENEYS LITERARY ARTS FUND | $120,640 |
| 826 NOLA | $15,000 |
| 826 MSP | $15,000 |
| 826 BOSTON | $10,000 |
| 826 MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| RICHMOND YOUNG WRITERS | $10,000 |
| 826 DC | $10,000 |
| 826 NYC | $10,000 |
| 826 VALENCIA | $10,000 |
| YOUNG AUTHORS GREENHOUSE | $10,000 |
| 826 LA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 42% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MLMCSWEENEY'S LITERARY ARTS FUND5× · 2020–2024 · $490k · revenue +170%
- 8I826DC INC5× · 2020–2024 · $78k · revenue +46%
- 8M826 MSP5× · 2019–2024 · $77k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- MWMISSOULA WRITING COLLABORATIVEone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -14%
- KWKIDS WRITE GOODone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +17%
- LELAKE ERIE INKgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
826 is the largest youth writing network in the country. 826 National serves as the hub of the movement to amplify student voices and champions the belief that strong writing skills are essential for lifelong success. Founded in 2002, the…
LitShop provides after-school and summer programming that pairs engaging literacy opportunities with building and making. By intentionally creating a supportive space where girls and gender-expansive youth can take risks, explore…
Write the world is a global online writing community that empowers teenagers to become stronger and more confident writers, critical thinkers, and engaged global citizens. by offering free access to daily writing prompts, monthly writing…
To create a rigorous, compassionate and inclusive environment to learn the art of reading and writing from accomplished authors.
The organizations mission is to empower young people in upper manhattan to write their own stories.
To arm young voices with the power of pen and prose, reinforcing teamwork, accountability, and responsibility, igniting social change on the page and stage.
The mission of Writers in the Schools (WITS) is to connect children and youth with professional writers and spoken word artists to unlock the joy and power of storytelling and creative expression.
The mission of mighty writers is to teach kids to think clearly and write with clarity so they can achieve success in work and in life. mighty writers provides free year-round writing programs for over 3,500 students each year.
See Statement O for description of programs and services.
At iWrite, we embrace both sides of literacy, focusing on the importance of being a reader and a writer at a young age.
Writers Matter serves public school students and teachers to provide curriculum and training to improve critical writing thinking of students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 826DC Inc and the most unlike its peers is Richmond Young Writers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MCSWEENEY'S LITERARY ARTS FUND ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AUTHORS GREENHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds 826DC INC ↗
- Who funds 826 MSP ↗
- Who funds 826 MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds 826 NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds 826CHI INC ↗
- Who funds 826NYC Inc ↗
- Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
- Who funds 826LA ↗
- Who funds 826 BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds Richmond Young Writers ↗
- Who funds VALENTINO ACHAK DENG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chapter 510 Ink ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF WITNESS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARMATCH INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOULA WRITING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds KIDS WRITE GOOD ↗
- Who funds LAKE ERIE INK ↗
- Who funds DEEP CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds READ AND WRITE KALAMAZOO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Apatow-Mann Family Foundation Inc · 826 National Inc · The Poetry Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hawkins Project funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hawkins Project?
Find your warmest path to The Hawkins Project through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.