Skip to content

· Private foundation

4S Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$278kHuman Services$76kInternational$10kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$2kPublic Benefit$1k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$892k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
One for Israel$20,000
Paul Anderson Youth Home$6,000
Bread of Life Mission$5,000
MIQLAT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Blue Letter Bible$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Bread of Life Giving and Sharing In: $3k → 19%Bread of Life Mission: $5k → 9%Bread of Life Mission: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
OR
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 14 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$348k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+106%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    AskDrBrown Ministries Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +9%
  • MM
    MORIEL MINISTRIES
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +57%
  • BI
    BEHOLD ISRAEL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +106%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • BO
    BREAD OF LIFE GIVING AND SHARING INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Greg Fritz Ministries Inc

To proclaim gospel of jesus.

Religion
4
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
5
Bible Helps

The organization shall seek to evangelize those who are non-christian, and shall encourage and help develop the christian faith among mankind by spreading the gospel, especially in the form of printed literature.

—
6
Basic Gospel Inc

Christian radio ministry through daily radio broadcasts, online streaming, conferences, and distribution of publications.

—
7
Byelorussian Mission Inc

Ministry

Human Services
8
Bible Open Air Mission

Purpose is sending individuals around the world to win souls to jesus christ by preaching the gospel evangelism.

Religion
9
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
10
Bread of Life Ministry Inc
—
11
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
12
Puzzle Piece Ministries

To deliver the message of Jesus

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Letter Bible; the most unlike its peers is Sharenet Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE FOR ISRAEL: $125,500 · OtherONE FOR ISRAELMESSIANIC VISION INC: $23,000 · OtherMESSIANIC VISION INCPrison Fellowship: $21,000 · OtherPrison FellowshipDiscovering the Jewish Jesus: $17,500 · OtherDiscovering the Jewish JesusGetzel Ministries: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $30,000 · Other+8 moreAskDrBrown Ministries Inc: $60,000 · ReligionAskDrBrown Ministries IncMichael S Heiser Foundation: $15,000 · ReligionMichael S Heiser FoundationMORIEL MINISTRIES: $12,000 · ReligionMORIEL MINISTRIESSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEBEHOLD ISRAEL: $7,000 · ReligionBEHOLD ISRAELPAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC: $30,500 · Human ServicesPAUL ANDERSO…BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $8,000 · Human ServicesBREAD OF LIF…BREAD OF LIFE GIVING AND SHARING INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesBREAD OF LIF…Sharenet Food Bank: $2,000 · Food & NutritionJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$227,000Religion$104,000Human Services$41,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAskDrBrown Ministries Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetPAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC: $30,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMichael S Heiser Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMORIEL MINISTRIES: $12,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBEHOLD ISRAEL: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE LETTER BIBLE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAD OF LIFE GIVING AND SHARING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSharenet Food Bank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE FOR ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds AskDrBrown Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Michael S Heiser Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MORIEL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BREAD OF LIFE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BEHOLD ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds BLUE LETTER BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds BREAD OF LIFE GIVING AND SHARING INC ↗
  • Who funds Sharenet Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 4S Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 4S Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 4S Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 4S Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 4S’ filings →

    More from the funding graph