Skip to content
4 US at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

4 US

4us equips pregnancy centers with the tools, technology, and talent to save more lives by providing ultrasound machines free to these centers to help women and families chose life.

$943k
Granted FY2023
28
Grants FY2023
11
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$2.1MHuman Services$187kEmployment$27kReligion$26k
02FY2023 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $694k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $229k
$28,350
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REAL OPTIONS OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS$117,814
BIRTH CHOICE OF DESERT$111,400
HAVEN CENTER$49,224
OPEN DOOR WOMENS CLINIC$41,900
THE CROSSING OF MANITOWOC COUNTY$37,300
PREGNANCY SOLUTIONS$37,300
HOPE MEDICAL OF WASHINGTON$36,707
IMAGE POINT MOBILE MEDICAL SERVICES$36,686
CLARITY CLINIC OF SW WISCONSIN$34,375
SPERO MEDICAL$32,500
OPTIONS PREGNANCY CLINIC$30,745
OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS$29,500
COLUMBIA PREGNANCY CENTER$28,350
LIVING ALTERNATIVES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$28,350
LIFE CHOICES CENTER$28,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $361k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIFE CHOICES CENTER: $28k → 20%OBRIA OF MEDICAL CLINIC BAY AREA HOUSTON: $39k → 14%PREGNANCY SOLUTIONS: $37k → 9%ANSWERS HEALTH AND RESOURCE FACILITY: $25k → 9%THE CROSSING OF MANITOWOC COUNTY: $37k → 11%PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF GRANTS PASS: $27k → 18%MIAMI VALLEY WOMENS CENTER: $27k → 14%HOPE MEDICAL OF WASHINGTON: $37k → 11%HAVEN CENTER: $49k → 11%HOPE RESTORE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $28k → 16%LIFE CENTERS OF VENTURE COUNTY: $23k → 10%NEXT STEP PREGNANCY CENTER: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
SD
OH
PA
CA
MO
KY
MD
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 4 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
36

Total granted

$381k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+29%

Still filing today

75%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $876k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’23
HealthHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound
    4× · 2017–2023 · $218k · revenue +83%
  • PA
    PREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGON
    3× · 2017–2023 · $82k · revenue +633%
  • WP
    Whittier Pregnancy Care Clinic
    3× · 2020–2023 · $64k · revenue -14%

Funded once

  • FI
    First Image
    2× · 2017–2022 · $53k · revenue +14%
  • CG
    COLUMBIA GORGE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERSgraduated
    2× · 2020–2022 · $53k · revenue +27%
  • HP
    HOPE PREGNANCY CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue +304%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
2
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
3
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
—
4
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
5
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
6
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
7
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
8
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
9
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
10
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
11
Life Choices Medical Clinic

Help women who are pregnant by giving them options to save their baby.

Unclassified
12
Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Resource Centers of Central Oregon; the most unlike its peers is Mountain Right to Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/111
Grantees still filing
71/111
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $218,479 · HealthCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget SoundREALOPTIONS: $117,814 · HealthREALOPTIONSWhittier Pregnancy Care Clinic: $64,400 · HealthFirst Image: $53,301 · HealthCOLUMBIA GORGE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERS: $52,700 · HealthHOPE PREGNANCY CLINIC: $51,900 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $48,430 · HealthHEALTHY WOMAN WOMEN'S CLINICS OF FLORIDA INC: $41,900 · Health+22 more: $587,122 · Health+22 moreBIRTH CHOICE CENTERS INC: $111,400 · OtherBIRTH CHOICE CENTERS INCPREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGON: $81,990 · OtherPREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DB…CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER: $42,850 · OtherCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTERPREGNANCY COUNSELING & INFO CENTER dba VINE MEDICAL: $37,300 · OtherPREGNANCY COUNSELING & INFO CENT…A WOMANS FRIEND: $35,782 · OtherCHOOSE LIFE OF JAMESTOWN INC: $33,350 · OtherHAGERSTOWN BIBLE CHURCH: $32,950 · OtherPregnancy Support Group of Woodland Inc Crisis Pregnancy Hotline: $32,500 · OtherPREGNANCY CENTER WEST: $30,350 · OtherLIVING ALTERNATIVES INC: $27,850 · OtherREAL OPTIONS OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS: $27,800 · OtherPRC CENTRAL OREGON: $26,900 · OtherRIGHT TO LIFE LEAGUE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $26,350 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES LIFECARE CENTER: $26,350 · OtherPREGNANCY CARE CENTERS INC: $25,950 · OtherCARENET PREGNANCY AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW WOMEN'S HEALTH: $24,030 · Other+2 more: $30,823 · OtherHAVEN CENTER: $49,224 · Human ServicesHAVEN CENTERAPM Outreach Inc Anchor Point: $38,923 · Human ServicesAPM Outreach Inc …PREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC: $37,300 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY SOLUTIO…THE CROSSING OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $37,300 · Human ServicesTHE CROSSING OF M…Hope Medical: $36,707 · Human ServicesHope MedicalLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC: $28,350 · Human ServicesLIFE CHOICES CENT…HOPE RESTORED PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $27,850 · Human ServicesHOPE RESTORED PRE…Pregnancy Care Center of Grants Pass: $27,424 · Human ServicesPregnancy Care Ce…HOPE RISING PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $26,900 · Human ServicesHOPE RISING PREGN…ANSWERS RESOURCE FACILITY: $25,400 · Human ServicesANSWERS RESOURCE …Life Centers of Ventura County: $23,100 · Human ServicesLife Centers of V…+1 more: $2,375 · Human ServicesOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $30,350 · Civil RightsOptions360 Women's Clinic: $28,379 · Civil RightsCare Net Womens Resource Center of North County: $26,350 · ReligionJMJ LIFE CENTER INC: $7,500 · Religion
Health$1,236,046Other$679,525Human Services$360,853Civil Rights$58,729Religion$33,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $218,479 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetREALOPTIONS: $117,814 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE CENTERS INC: $111,400 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetPREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGON: $81,990 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetWhittier Pregnancy Care Clinic: $64,400 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetFirst Image: $53,301 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCOLUMBIA GORGE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERS: $52,700 over 2y, 18% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CLINIC: $51,900 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetHAVEN CENTER: $49,224 over 1y, 21% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $48,430 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTHY WOMAN WOMEN'S CLINICS OF FLORIDA INC: $41,900 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetAPM Outreach Inc Anchor Point: $38,923 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPREGNANCY COUNSELING & INFO CENTER dba VINE MEDICAL: $37,300 over 1y, 16% of budgetPREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC: $37,300 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE CROSSING OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $37,300 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetHope Medical: $36,707 over 1y, 13% of budgetIMAGE POINT MOBILE MEDICAL SERVICES: $36,686 over 1y, 16% of budgetA WOMANS FRIEND: $35,782 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetOPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $34,600 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCLARITY CLINIC OF SW WISCONSIN LTD: $34,375 over 1y, 12% of budgetSIERRA PREGNANCY & HEALTH: $33,350 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetA NEW GENERATION OF HERNANDO INC: $33,350 over 1y, 13% of budgetPregnancy Choices of Skagit County: $32,556 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetPregnancy Support Group of Woodland Inc Crisis Pregnancy Hotline: $32,500 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetOPTIONS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $30,745 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSUMMIT LIFE OUTREACH CENTER INC: $30,450 over 1y, 24% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER WEST: $30,350 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $30,350 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC: $28,950 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetColumbia Pregnancy Clinic & Family Resources: $28,350 over 1y, 22% of budgetLIVING ALTERNATIVES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $28,350 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE INC: $28,350 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC: $28,350 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetLIVING ALTERNATIVES INC: $27,850 over 1y, 15% of budgetCONEJO VALLEY WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $27,850 over 1y, 12% of budgetHOPE RESTORED PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $27,850 over 1y, 13% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $27,800 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetPregnancy Care Center of Grants Pass: $27,424 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetTHRIVE ST LOUIS INC: $27,300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE RISING PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $26,900 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES LIFECARE CENTER: $26,350 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCare Net Womens Resource Center of North County: $26,350 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetPORTICO INC: $26,350 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $25,975 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTERS INC: $25,950 over 1y, 15% of budgetMy Choices DBA Obria Medical Clinics PNW: $25,950 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetANSWERS RESOURCE FACILITY: $25,400 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetLife Centers of Ventura County: $23,100 over 1y, 9.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…Vitamin Angel Allianc…Save the StorksMission Pre-Born IncAbundant Life WACare NetFlorida K of C Charit…Community Foundation …Florida Pregnancy Car…Knights of Columbus C…Share the DoughTrust Funds Incorpora…
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT163.7× affinity91 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Save the Storks · Mission Pre-Born Inc · Abundant Life WA · Care Net · Florida K of C Charities Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Florida Pregnancy Care Network Inc · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · Share the Dough · Trust Funds Incorporated

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 4 US funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 4 US. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Pregnancy Alternatives Center Dba Obria Medical Clinics Oregon: 38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 4 US?

Find your warmest path to 4 US through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 4 US’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home