· Public charity
Abundant Life WA
To be an effective and immediate resource by providing labor, supplies, funds, etc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $332,860 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $416,801 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $83,941 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $224k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Love Life | $34,948 |
| Tiny Hearbeat Ministries | $32,918 |
| Acres of Diamonds | $23,567 |
| Two Hearts Pregnancy Aid | $16,943 |
| Open Arms Real Choices Clinic | $15,905 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,313 |
| Care Net of Puget Sound | $14,944 |
| Antioch Adoptions | $13,785 |
| New Way Ministries | $12,500 |
| Whidbey Island Women's Clinic | $11,019 |
| Whatcom County Preganancy | $10,829 |
| Life House Ministries | $10,719 |
| Engedi Refuge | $10,232 |
| Pregnancy Resouce Clinic | $9,498 |
| Options Preganancy Clinic | $8,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AOAcres of Diamonds6× · 2019–2024 · $148k · revenue +92%
- PAPREGNANCY AID3× · 2018–2020 · $141k · revenue +28%
- THTWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID4× · 2021–2024 · $103k · revenue +266%
Funded once
- PRPregnancy Resources Centerone grant, 2019 · $53k
- PRPregnancy Resource Centerone grant, 2020 · $46k
- LHLIVING HOPEone grant, 2020 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
Choosing Life over Abortion
An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.
Hope Medical of Washington is a faith-based, non-profit community medical clinic providing compassionate, evidence-based health care services to empower people to make informed decisions. We offer free, confidential services including free…
The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.
Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…
To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.
The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
Womens Services is a Gospel-centered,life-affirming medical clinic for the Johnson City area that provides free services to women, including pregnancy and STI testing, sexual health consultations, and limited ultrasounds. We also provide…
Help women who are pregnant by giving them options to save their baby.
Help women with the necessary care they need to avoid an abortion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Healing Hearts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Acres of Diamonds ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY AID ↗
- Who funds TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID ↗
- Who funds Global Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE ↗
- Who funds Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM COUNTY PREGNANCY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS ↗
- Who funds Tiny Heartbeat Ministries ↗
- Who funds Whidbey Island Women's Clinic ↗
- Who funds LIFE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LAHAI HEALTH ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS PREGNANCY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Next Step Pregnancy Services ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Choices of Skagit County ↗
- Who funds Healing Hearts Ministries International ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS PCC AND REAL CHOICES ↗
- Who funds ENGEDI REFUGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LIFE SERVICES OF SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds HEALING HEARTS INC ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: 4 US · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Knights of Columbus Seattle Council No 676 · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Edward Jones Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abundant Life WA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Abundant Life WA?
Find your warmest path to Abundant Life WA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.