Skip to content
100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to encourage women's involvement in philanthropy and improve local communities.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$340kHuman Services$175kFood & Nutrition$120kHousing & Shelter$117kEducation$113kCrime & Legal$80kEmployment$60kRecreation & Sports$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$180k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME FIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$40,000
FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH$40,000
THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT$40,000
BAY AREA TUTORING$20,000
COMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA$20,000
RECOVERY CAFE SAN JOSE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $343k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $40k → 10%Catholic Charities Youth Club at St Francis of Assisi: $10k → 10%The Grateful Garment Project: $40k → 8%Parents Helping Parents: $40k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 8%First Place for Youth: $40k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $40k → 8%RECOVERY CAFE SAN JOSE: $20k → 8%Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence: $15k → 8%Sunday Friends Foundation: $10k → 8%Bill Wilson Center: $8k → 8%THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT: $40k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 74%.

100 Women Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$267k · 5 repeat orgs$828k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
26

Total granted

$267k
$728k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+44%

Still filing today

100%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The Grateful Garment Project
    2× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +5%
  • FP
    FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH
    2× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +44%
  • NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    2× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • EO
    EACH ONE REACH ONE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -48%
  • NN
    NAMI Nationalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +543%
  • PC
    PIVOTAL CONNECTIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
2
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
3
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
4
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
5
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
6
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

—
7
Dependency Advocacy Center

Dependency advocacy center (dac) provides zealous legal representation to indigent clients in the juvenile dependency system to promote timely reunification and preservation of families in a safe, healthy environment. dac believes that…

Crime & Legal
8
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
9
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
10
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
11
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
12
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parents Helping Parents Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Grateful Garment Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
34/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Grateful Garment Project: $80,000 · Human ServicesThe Grateful Garment ProjectFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $80,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTHNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $55,000 · Human ServicesNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIO…PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INCPACIFIC CLINICS: $40,000 · Human ServicesPACIFIC CLINICSRecovery Cafe San Jose: $20,000 · Human ServicesRecovery Cafe San Jose+3 more: $28,000 · Human Services+3 moreEACH ONE REACH ONE INC: $45,000 · OtherEACH ONE REACH ONE INCPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $45,000 · OtherPIVOTAL CONNECTIONSPARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL INC: $40,000 · OtherPARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL INCPeninula Food Runners: $40,000 · OtherPeninula Food RunnersHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $40,000 · OtherHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA …RECOVERY CAFE: $40,000 · OtherRECOVERY CAFEInterbranch Special Projects Foundation of Santa Clara County ISPF AAUW: $20,000 · OtherInterbranch Special Projects Found…MORGAN AUTISM CENTER: $12,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA INC: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA INCSOMOS MAYFAIR INC: $12,000 · Other+2 more: $18,000 · Other+2 moreNAMI National: $45,000 · HealthNAMI NationalONE LIFE COUNSELING CENTER: $40,000 · HealthONE LIFE COUNSE…LATINAS CONTRA CANCER: $40,000 · HealthLATINAS CONTRA …THE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERI…LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD: $8,000 · HealthLUCILE SALTER P…Peninsula Food Runners Inc: $40,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $40,000 · Food & NutritionFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE TUTORING INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY: $32,000 · EducationBay Area Tutoring Asociation: $20,000 · EducationSilicon Valley Urban Debate League: $10,000 · EducationThiebaut Method: $10,000 · EducationBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $40,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$343,000Other$332,000Health$148,000Food & Nutrition$80,000Youth Development$80,000Education$72,000Recreation & Sports$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Grateful Garment Project: $80,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $55,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEACH ONE REACH ONE INC: $45,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetNAMI National: $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $45,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $40,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetONE LIFE COUNSELING CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLATINAS CONTRA CANCER: $40,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPeninsula Food Runners Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE TUTORING INC: $40,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY: $32,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRecovery Cafe San Jose: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBay Area Tutoring Asociation: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetInterbranch Special Projects Foundation of Santa Clara County ISPF AAUW: $20,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORGAN AUTISM CENTER: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOMOS MAYFAIR INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMy Digital TAT2 Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSilicon Valley Urban Debate League: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThiebaut Method: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Jose Mercury News…Silicon Valley Commun…The Sobrato Family Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Los Altos Mountain Vi…The Palo Alto Communi…Bright Funds Foundati…Valley Health Foundat…The David and Lucile …Rotary Club of San Jo…Destination Home SV c…Gordon E and Betty I …
San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund IncCA44.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Bright Funds Foundation · Valley Health Foundation (Vhf) · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 100 Women’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home