Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Community foundation

100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to encourage women's involvement in philanthropy and improve local communities.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$340kHuman Services$175kFood & Nutrition$120kHousing & Shelter$117kEducation$113kCrime & Legal$80kEmployment$60kRecreation & Sports$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$180k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME FIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$40,000
THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT$40,000
FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH$40,000
RECOVERY CAFE SAN JOSE$20,000
COMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA$20,000
BAY AREA TUTORING$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $343k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Grateful Garment Project: $40k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $40k → 10%Catholic Charities Youth Club at St Francis of Assisi: $10k → 10%Parents Helping Parents: $40k → 8%First Place for Youth: $40k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $40k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 8%RECOVERY CAFE SAN JOSE: $20k → 8%Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence: $15k → 8%Sunday Friends Foundation: $10k → 8%Bill Wilson Center: $8k → 8%THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT: $40k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 74% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

100 Women Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$267k · 5 repeat orgs$828k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
26

Total granted

$267k
$728k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+44%

Still filing today

100%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The Grateful Garment Project
    2× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +5%
  • FP
    FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH
    2× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +44%
  • NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    2× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • PC
    PIVOTAL CONNECTIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +28%
  • NN
    NAMI Nationalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +543%
  • EO
    EACH ONE REACH ONE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
2
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
3
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
4
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
5
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
6
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

—
7
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
8
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
9
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
10
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
12
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parents Helping Parents Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Grateful Garment Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr16%24%35–55yr9%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr15%39%20–35yr16%29%35–55yr9%3%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/41
the rest of the field
11%
1,112/10,436

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
34/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Grateful Garment Project — $80,000 · Human ServicesThe Grateful Garment ProjectFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $80,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTHNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $55,000 · Human ServicesNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIO…PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INCPACIFIC CLINICS — $40,000 · Human ServicesPACIFIC CLINICSRecovery Cafe San Jose — $20,000 · Human ServicesRecovery Cafe San Jose+3 more — $28,000 · Human Services+3 morePIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $45,000 · OtherPIVOTAL CONNECTIONSEACH ONE REACH ONE INC — $45,000 · OtherEACH ONE REACH ONE INCRECOVERY CAFE — $40,000 · OtherRECOVERY CAFEHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $40,000 · OtherHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA …Peninula Food Runners — $40,000 · OtherPeninula Food RunnersPARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL INC — $40,000 · OtherPARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL INCInterbranch Special Projects Foundation of Santa Clara County ISPF AAUW — $20,000 · OtherInterbranch Special Projects Found…MORGAN AUTISM CENTER — $12,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA INC — $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA INCSOMOS MAYFAIR INC — $12,000 · Other+2 more — $18,000 · Other+2 moreNAMI National — $45,000 · HealthNAMI NationalLATINAS CONTRA CANCER — $40,000 · HealthLATINAS CONTRA …ONE LIFE COUNSELING CENTER — $40,000 · HealthONE LIFE COUNSE…THE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $15,000 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERI…LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD — $8,000 · HealthLUCILE SALTER P…FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE TUTORING INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentPeninsula Food Runners Inc — $40,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN — $40,000 · Food & NutritionREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY — $32,000 · EducationBay Area Tutoring Asociation — $20,000 · EducationSilicon Valley Urban Debate League — $10,000 · EducationThiebaut Method — $10,000 · EducationBay Area Womens Sports Initiative — $40,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$343,000Other$332,000Health$148,000Youth Development$80,000Food & Nutrition$80,000Education$72,000Recreation & Sports$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Grateful Garment Project — $80,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $55,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $45,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNAMI National — $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEACH ONE REACH ONE INC — $45,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetPeninsula Food Runners Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLATINAS CONTRA CANCER — $40,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative — $40,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN — $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetONE LIFE COUNSELING CENTER — $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE TUTORING INC — $40,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetPARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY — $32,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRecovery Cafe San Jose — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CYCLES OF CALIFORNIA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBay Area Tutoring Asociation — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetInterbranch Special Projects Foundation of Santa Clara County ISPF AAUW — $20,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORGAN AUTISM CENTER — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOMOS MAYFAIR INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMy Digital TAT2 Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Urban Debate League — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThiebaut Method — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Jose Mercury News…Silicon Valley Commun…The Sobrato Family Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Los Altos Mountain Vi…The Palo Alto Communi…Bright Funds Foundati…Valley Health Foundat…The David and Lucile …Rotary Club of San Jo…Destination Home SV c…Gordon E and Betty I …
San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund IncCA44.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Bright Funds Foundation · Valley Health Foundation (Vhf) · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to 100 Women Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines