Skip to content

· Public charity

100 Who Give Inc

Raise awareness and make contributions to local charities

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $147,230, the rows itemized in this filing. The $214,670 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $67,440 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
$11,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wake Monarch Academy$26,343
Hope Renovations$20,700
Family Promise of the Triangle$17,063
Neighbor to Neighbor$14,832
Made4Me$13,550
New Leaf Behavioral Health$11,300
Community Empowerment Fund$8,400
PORCH$8,300
Equity Before Birth$8,000
Reality Ministries$6,500
Pretty In Pink Foundation$6,121
Converting Hearts Ministry$6,121
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Equity Before Birth: $8k → 11%Made4Me: $14k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
2
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
3
Equality Nc

Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.

Civil Rights
4
Disability Rights North Carolina

Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.

—
5
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
6
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
7
Promise Resource Network Inc

Through the wisdom of lived recovery experience, we ignite social change, inspire hope and serve as a catalyst for personal greatness.

Health
8
Cumberland County Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
9
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
10
Enable of Georgia Inc

Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.

Housing & Shelter
11
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
12
Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corp

Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reality Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Made4me. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wake Monarch Academy: $26,343 · OtherWake Monarch AcademyFamily Promise of the Triangle: $17,063 · OtherFamily Promise of the TriangleConverting Hearts Ministry: $6,121 · OtherConverting Hearts MinistryMade4me: $13,550 · Human ServicesMade4meEQUITY BEFORE BIRTH: $8,000 · Human ServicesEQUITY BEFORE BI…NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES: $14,832 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBOR TO NEIG…REALITY MINISTRIES INC: $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentREALITY MINISTRI…HOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER: $20,700 · EmploymentHOPE RENOVATION…NEW LEAF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $11,300 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUND: $8,400 · Community ImprovementPORCH INC: $8,300 · Food & NutritionPRETTY IN PINK FOUNDATION INC: $6,121 · Philanthropy
Other$49,527Human Services$21,550Youth Development$21,332Employment$20,700Health$11,300Community Improvement$8,400Food & Nutrition$8,300Philanthropy$6,121

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER: $20,700 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES: $14,832 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMade4me: $13,550 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetNEW LEAF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $11,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUND: $8,400 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPORCH INC: $8,300 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetEQUITY BEFORE BIRTH: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetREALITY MINISTRIES INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPRETTY IN PINK FOUNDATION INC: $6,121 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Strowd Roses Inc · John William Pope Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke University · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 100 Who Give Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 100 Who Give Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 100 Who Give Inc?

    Find your warmest path to 100 Who Give Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 100 Who Give’s filings →

    More from the funding graph