· Public charity
100 Who Give Inc
Raise awareness and make contributions to local charities
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $147,230 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $214,670 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $67,440 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Wake Monarch Academy | $26,343 |
| Hope Renovations | $20,700 |
| Family Promise of the Triangle | $17,063 |
| Neighbor to Neighbor | $14,832 |
| Made4Me | $13,550 |
| New Leaf Behavioral Health | $11,300 |
| Community Empowerment Fund | $8,400 |
| PORCH | $8,300 |
| Equity Before Birth | $8,000 |
| Reality Ministries | $6,500 |
| Pretty In Pink Foundation | $6,121 |
| Converting Hearts Ministry | $6,121 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community
Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.
Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.
Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.
Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Through the wisdom of lived recovery experience, we ignite social change, inspire hope and serve as a catalyst for personal greatness.
Seeking to put gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.
To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.
Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.
Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.
Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reality Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Made4me. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Made4me ↗
- Who funds NEW LEAF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds PORCH INC ↗
- Who funds EQUITY BEFORE BIRTH ↗
- Who funds REALITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PRETTY IN PINK FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Strowd Roses Inc · John William Pope Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke University · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 100 Who Give Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to 100 Who Give Inc?
Find your warmest path to 100 Who Give Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.