Skip to content

· Public charity

100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$2.4MCrime & Legal$145k
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 33 grants below total $517,835, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,480,471 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,962,636 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $458k
$13,680
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO CITY FD$43,500
COPPER CANYON FD$30,675
FORT MOHAVE MESA FD$30,000
GOODYEAR PD$27,072
GLENDALE PD$25,000
TEMPE FIRE & MEDICAL$24,623
PHOENIX PD$24,242
PRESCOTT FD$22,000
PARKER FD$19,682
ALPINE FD$18,957
ELFRIDA FD$18,359
BUCKEYE PD$18,167
NO ARIZONA FD$17,276
CORONA DE TUCSON FD$15,749
RINCON FD$13,842
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELMET PEAK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $12k → 15%HELMET PEAK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 57 repeat orgs$833k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
46

Total granted

$2.3M
$655k

Still filing today

4%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    State of Arizona
    2× · 2018–2023 · $205k
  • CO
    City of Tempe
    4× · 2021–2025 · $149k
  • CO
    CITY OF PHOENIX
    4× · 2018–2025 · $98k

Funded once

  • TF
    TUBAC FIRE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $68k
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF YAVAPAI
    one grant, 2024 · $53k
  • K(
    KJZZKBAQ (THROUGH MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES)
    one grant, 2020 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

State of Arizona: $205,121 · OtherState of ArizonaCity of Tempe: $148,623 · Other+107 more: $2,694,712 · Other+107 moreREGIONAL FIRE & RESCUE: $17,948 · Public Safety & DisasterHigh Country Fire-Rescue: $10,622 · Public Safety & DisasterHELMET PEAK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $22,636 · Human Services
Other$3,048,456Public Safety & Disaster$28,570Human Services$22,636

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGIONAL FIRE & RESCUE: $17,948 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHigh Country Fire-Rescue: $10,622 over 2y, 7.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation IncFL59.9× affinity43 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · National Recreation and Park Association · Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens · Arizona Family Health Partnership · The Institute for Intergovernmental Research Inc · Kids Need to Read · Burton Family Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 100 Club of Arizona funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 100 Club of Arizona. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 100 Club of Arizona’s filings →

    More from the funding graph