· Public charity
Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc
The area agency on aging, region one is a private non-profit organization that partners with their community to foster innovative programs and services to enrich the quality of life for older adults, caregivers and underserved populations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+17 grants · $15M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARICOPA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT | $2,333,123 |
| ALLTHRIVE 365 FKA FSL PROGRAMS | $1,940,952 |
| CITY OF PHOENIX | $1,902,983 |
| ATTENTIVE HOME HEALTH | $1,259,064 |
| ASTER AGING INC | $1,175,842 |
| BENEVILLA | $700,285 |
| ALARY'S HOME CARE | $635,263 |
| ARIZONA YWCA METROPOLITAN PHOENIX | $624,411 |
| LIVE WELL SENIOR CARE LLC | $548,512 |
| BANNER HEALTH AN ARIZONA NONPROFIT CORPORATION | $547,500 |
| AZCEND | $457,716 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $438,582 |
| CITY OF AVONDALE | $420,417 |
| OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC | $413,503 |
| AZ SENIOR CITIZEN'S LAW PROJECT INC | $379,388 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $38.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
55 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC)8× · 2017–2025 · $8.9M · revenue +13% · 42% of their budget
- SCSUN CITY AREA INTERFAITH SERVICES INC DBA BENEVILLA8× · 2017–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +64%
- BHBanner Health8× · 2017–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +68%
Funded once
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2017 · $370k
- SSUNTREEone grant, 2017 · $256k
- HSHOMEINSTEAD SENIOR CAREone grant, 2017 · $189k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.
To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.
Our mission is to promote dignity and respect for aging, and to advocate for independence in the lives of Pima County's older adults and their families, now and for generations to come.
Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely, and with peace of mind.
To provide home and community-based services and develop energy-efficient, affordable housing to promote health, independence and dignity for all.
Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely and with peace of mind.
Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely and with peace of mind.
Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely and with peace of mind.
Interfaith Community Services' mission is to provide pathways leading to more stable and self-sufficient lives.
Non-medical senior support services to area residents
Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely and with peace of mind.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest and the most unlike its peers is All Faith Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FSL PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds ASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC) ↗
- Who funds SUN CITY AREA INTERFAITH SERVICES INC DBA BENEVILLA ↗
- Who funds YWCA Metropolitan Phoenix ↗
- Who funds Banner Health ↗
- Who funds AZCEND ↗
- Who funds Tempe Community Action Agency Inc ↗
- Who funds OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Senior Citizens Law Project ↗
- Who funds DUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC ↗
- Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
- Who funds MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds Foothills Caring Corps Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · Arizona Food Bank Network · Valley of the Sun United Way · Mesa United Way Inc · United Food Bank · Scan Desert Health Plan Inc · Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens · Pima Council on Aging
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.