Skip to content

Arizona · Public charity

Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens

To provide services for seniors with disabilities and caregivers, either directly or through a network of provider agencies.

$2.8M
Granted FY2023
16
Itemized grants FY2023
15
Organizations funded FY2023
7%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$2.0M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$120,468
Largest grant, FY2023
$658,092
Organizations funded a year
15 to 16
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
3
Total assets, FY2023
$4.1M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 7% of the organizations Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202315$2.0M7%
FY202216$2.1M6%
FY202116$2.0Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Human Services$3.1MEnvironment$2.4MHealth$533kHousing & Shelter$117kCommunity Improvement$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Accentcare at Home$1,750,2473n/a
Payson Senior Center Inc$602,409319%
City of Casa Grande$498,6183n/a
Town of Hayden$468,4683n/a
Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc$438,28431%
City of Apache Junction$431,3042n/a
City of Globe$394,6483n/a
Town of Miami$352,1723n/a
Circle of Life Home Health$273,4643n/a
Town of Superior$270,7373n/a
Show all 18 grantees
All grantees of Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Accentcare at Home$1,750,2473n/a
Payson Senior Center Inc$602,409319%
City of Casa Grande$498,6183n/a
Town of Hayden$468,4683n/a
Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc$438,28431%
City of Apache Junction$431,3042n/a
City of Globe$394,6483n/a
Town of Miami$352,1723n/a
Circle of Life Home Health$273,4643n/a
Town of Superior$270,7373n/a
Marc Community Resources Inc$253,12230%
Aires$164,0533n/a
Oakwood Creative Care Inc$101,88033%
Community Action Human Resources Agency$76,42131%
Home Sweet Homecare Agency$58,2121n/a
North Gila County Cert$50,5823n/a
Arizona Lutheran Senior Ministries Inc$9,1121n/a
Ability360 Inc$6,00010%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc · 100 Club of Arizona · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens?

Find your warmest path to Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens

How much does Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens give?
Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens reported 16 itemized grants totaling $2,029,038, out of $2,836,046 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 15 and 16 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (50%), Environment (39%), Health (9%).
Who are Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2023: Accentcare at Home ($1.8M), Payson Senior Center Inc ($602k), City of Casa Grande ($499k).
Does Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Arizona Community Foundation, Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc, 100 Club of Arizona.
Where is Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens based?
Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $348k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens’ filings →

More from the funding graph