Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,355,489 to it, the largest being JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION ($2,100,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$28M
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$4.4M
Net assets
$369k
7/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Workforce Development Council Seattle-Ki does

Mission

The workforce development council of seattle king county (wdc) is a nonprofit organization driving regional strategies to create an equitable, inclusive and resilient workforce system. We bring together public and private, and community partners to remove barriers, align resources and support economic opportunity for all.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The workforce development council of seattle king-county (wdc) serves as the local workforce development board under the federal workforce innovation and opportunity act(wioa). We operate as a regional backbone organization, convening stakeholders, shaping policy, and investing in solutions that reflect industry and community needs and priorities. The workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa title I) funding the wdc receives is used to serve adults, dislocated workers, and youth while also funding business services and worksource system operations. This funding is braided with king county veterans, seniors & human services levy (vshsl) funds, which allows us to expand services to a broader range of adults who are furthest from opportunity, overrepresented among low-income and unemployed individuals, and historically underrepresented in their access to services. The wioa youth program provides comprehensive support to in-school (ages 14-21) and out-of-school (ages 16-24) youth facing significant educational and career obstacles. In program year 2024, the wdc served 1,475 new enrollees across all programs, with 1,486 carry-ins producing 2,961 active enrollments. A total of 155…

    $26,455,443 spentof which $22,501,640 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $26,455,443.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($14M) Expenses 100 ($15M) Net assets 100 ($215k)2018 Revenue 95 ($14M) Expenses 94 ($14M) Net assets 65 ($141k)2019 Revenue 96 ($14M) Expenses 88 ($13M) Net assets 521 ($1.1M)2020 Revenue 79 ($11M) Expenses 79 ($12M) Net assets 441 ($948k)2021 Revenue 98 ($14M) Expenses 93 ($14M) Net assets 700 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 112 ($16M) Expenses 104 ($15M) Net assets 400 ($859k)2023 Revenue 129 ($19M) Expenses 129 ($19M) Net assets 219 ($471k)2024 Revenue 161 ($23M) Expenses 158 ($23M) Net assets 237 ($508k)2025 Revenue 195 ($28M) Expenses 193 ($28M) Net assets 172 ($369k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (195)Expenses (193)Net assets (172)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $4.7M to $6.0M (+29%).

$2.1M
$2.2M
$3.1M
$3.4M
$4.2M
$3.9M
$4.7M
$6.0M
$6.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 99% · 2018 100% · 2019 90% · 2020 96% · 2021 95% · 2022 92% · 2023 96% · 2024 94% · 2025 98%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 457 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$244k
’17
−$74k
’18
$980k
’19
−$173k
’20
$558k
’21
$909k
’22
−$388k
’23
$38k
’24
−$201k
’25
0.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Marie Kurose

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Jiquanda Nelson

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed192027303132263128
Joined·+7+12+9+13+2+5+11+8
No longer listed·65612111611
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 6 funders, grant income rose $100k → $667k.

2 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $3.5M from one payer (the same organization on both sides, largest Workforce Development Council Seattle-Ki); $495k from 3 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington). These are real filings, and they are not money WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI raised.

From the IRS filings of WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 82%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

48%
largest funder
82%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 59% · 2019 59% · 2020 56% · 2021 49% · 2022 52% · 2023 43% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

67% of WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 70% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI draws 93% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 5 states in all.

WA
NY
MA
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $77k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI has grown faster than half of the 274 employment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−1% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 274 employment nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $10.0M on record.

Federal$10.0M
grants $10.0Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$7.0M
  • Department of Labor$3.0M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 7%Fundraising 0%

Governance

20
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • City of Seattle · exempt
  • King County · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI?
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,355,489 to it, the largest being JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION ($2,100,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $4,355,489 in grants to WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI?
JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing