Skip to content

North Carolina · Nonprofit

WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW

WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW (North Carolina) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $121,743 to it, the largest being Z SMITH REYNOLDS FOUNDATION INC ($30,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$42k
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$122k
Net assets
$51k
4/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 37%
01What it does

What WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW does

Mission

Women NC empowers youth leaders to advance gender equity in North Carolina through research, advocacy, and mentorship. Our program equips students with the tools to analyze gender disparities and propose policy solutions. Together, we're building a pipeline of informed, equity-driven leaders prepared to create communities free of gender discrimination.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. The University Student Partners Program is a collaboration with local colleges and universities to bring Women NC into the classroom as a community partner. Students have the opportunity to complete a research project, capstone project, internship, or independent study. Students presented work at CSW.

    $6,000 spent
    13% of program spending
  2. The Cities for CEDAW initiative is a compaign to protect the rights of women and girls by passing ordinances and establishing the principals of CEDAW. Women NC is performing a gender analysis in Greensboro NC.

    $21,000 spent
    47% of program spending
  3. The Women NC Scholars Program is a competitive application-based comprehensive leadership development opportunity for college and university students. Women NC successfully retained 3 students for the upcoming year.

    $18,030 spent
    40% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $45,030.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($27k) Expenses 100 ($23k) Net assets 100 ($49k)2018 Revenue 268 ($71k) Expenses 114 ($26k) Net assets 185 ($90k)2019 Revenue 160 ($43k) Expenses 387 ($87k) Net assets 94 ($46k)2020 Revenue 189 ($50k) Expenses 256 ($58k) Net assets 78 ($38k)2021 Revenue 345 ($92k) Expenses 241 ($54k) Net assets 155 ($75k)2022 Revenue 411 ($109k) Expenses 343 ($77k) Net assets 221 ($107k)2023 Revenue 211 ($56k) Expenses 357 ($80k) Net assets 171 ($83k)2024 Revenue 253 ($67k) Expenses 265 ($60k) Net assets 186 ($90k)2025 Revenue 157 ($42k) Expenses 316 ($71k) Net assets 105 ($51k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (157)Expenses (316)Net assets (105)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $90k to $48k (−47%).

$49k
$90k
$48k
$46k
$83k
$115k
$91k
$90k
$51k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (65% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 26,798 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$4k
’17
$46k
’18
−$45k
’19
−$8k
’20
$37k
’21
$32k
’22
−$24k
’23
$7k
’24
−$29k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $21k → $68.

4 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

60% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW.

25%
largest funder
64%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 51% · 2021 89% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

0% of WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 40% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

73% of WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW's grant income comes from North Carolina funders.

NY
DE
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
North Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $59k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW has grown faster than half of the 17,277 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−70% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,277 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Carolina

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW?
WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW (North Carolina) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $121,743 to it, the largest being Z SMITH REYNOLDS FOUNDATION INC ($30,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $121,743 in grants to WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW?
Z SMITH REYNOLDS FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $30,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds WomenNC-NC Committee for CSW-CEDAW →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing