Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA

WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA (Texas) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $328,044 to it, the largest being Willard And Ruth Johnson Charitable Foundation ($122,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.5M
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$328k
Net assets
$560k
5/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%
01What it does

What Women of Pader Uganda does

Mission

The Women of Pader Uganda exists to ignite hope, healing, and empowerment in the women and community of war-torn uganda by offering employment, education, programs, projects, and more.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The organization raises money and provides grants to a community-based organization in pader, uganda. The purpose of these grants is: (1) to share the gospel, (2) to train women in making paper bead jewelry, (3) to support women starting small businesses, (4) to provide scholarships to children in school and vocational school, (5) to provide training and resources to families farming maize, (6) to provide women with pigs to raise and sell, (7) to provide food and medical services to the poor, and (8) to provide counseling, trauma recovery programs, and addiction recovery programs. Since the Women of Pader Uganda started providing these grants, the community-based organization in pader, uganda has served more than 15,000 members of the community in pader and helped provide approximately 1,176 jobs in pader.

    $1,120,260 spentof which $1,006,381 as grants$45,968 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,120,260.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($425k) Expenses 100 ($445k) Net assets 100 ($203k)2021 Revenue 306 ($1.3M) Expenses 330 ($1.5M) Net assets 18 ($37k)2022 Revenue 390 ($1.7M) Expenses 303 ($1.3M) Net assets 169 ($343k)2023 Revenue 270 ($1.1M) Expenses 264 ($1.2M) Net assets 155 ($315k)2024 Revenue 266 ($1.1M) Expenses 281 ($1.3M) Net assets 95 ($194k)2025 Revenue 364 ($1.5M) Expenses 266 ($1.2M) Net assets 275 ($560k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (364)Expenses (266)Net assets (275)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $198k to $570k (+188%).

$206k
$41k
$348k
$318k
$198k
$570k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

99% of WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,679 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

−$20k
’20
−$167k
’21
$306k
’22
−$28k
’23
−$121k
’24
$366k
’25
5.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202020212022202320242025
Listed555555
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·00000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 6 funders, grant income rose $10k → $40k.

5 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 57% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 37% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

59% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA.

37%
largest funder
77%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 67% · 2020 100% · 2021 96% · 2022 53% · 2023 50% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 42% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

57% of WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $141k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Texas funders.

NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $187k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 718 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin24% · top quartile
Months of reserve5.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)30% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 718 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 3%Fundraising 2%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

45%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA?
WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA (Texas) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $328,044 to it, the largest being Willard And Ruth Johnson Charitable Foundation ($122,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $328,044 in grants to WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA?
Willard And Ruth Johnson Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $122,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOMEN OF PADER UGANDA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Women of Pader Uganda →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing