Washington · Nonprofit
UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT
UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $124,548 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($52,680). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT has grown faster than half of the 2,211 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,211 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Anna B Stearns Charitable Foundation Incshared funders
- One Days Wagesportfolio match
- Together Women Riseportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $24k → $8k.
3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 73% · 2018 68% · 2019 100% · 2020 97% · 2021 36% · 2022 95% · 2023 96% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $60k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Anna B Stearns Charitable Foundation Incshared fundersMA · backs 43 organizations that share your funders
- One Days Wagesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Together Women Riseportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Circle of Sisterhood Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Allpeoplebehappy Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Segal Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Water From Wineportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Population Connectionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Good Works Institute Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Aid for Africa Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Unfcu Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Yang Jing Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
76% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT?
- UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $124,548 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($52,680). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $124,548 in grants to UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT?
- Network for Good is the largest funder on record, with $52,680 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like UGANDA VILLAGE PROJECT find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing