Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

THE LANDS COUNCIL

THE LANDS COUNCIL (Washington) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $472,741 to it, the largest being PATAGONIAORG ($87,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$969k
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$473k
Net assets
$169k
8/21 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What The Lands Council does

Mission

Preserves and revitalizes our inland northwest forests, water, and wildlife through advocacy, education, effective action, and community engagement.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Public lands and wildlife program: tlc's public lands and wildlife program seeks to protect old growth, improve forest management, permanently protect roadless areas, and increase populations of rare, threatened, and endangered species on public lands in the inland northwest. To achieve our goals, we use science, collaboration, and when necessary, litigation. We participate in forest management projects in ne washington and n idaho. We have helped start four collaborative groups on three national forests that include diverse stakeholder.

    $207,143 spent$6,840 earned by the program
    25% of program spending
  2. Watershed protection and restoration program: tlc's watershed program works in the spokane and coeur d'alene river watersheds to restore water quality. We improve streamside habitat by planting native trees and plants, work to reduce toxics flowing into water bodies with unique project that capture and clean polluted stormwater. Out beaver coexistence program helps landowners coexist with beavers, allowing beaver-derived ecosystem services such as wetland creation and water storage to flourish on the landscape.

    $172,359 spent
    21% of program spending
  3. Climate justice and urban ecology program: tlc's climate justice program involves working with low income and underserved communities to inform them about efforts to reduce exposure to toxic chemicals in their environment. Our spocanopy program works with the city of spokane to plant free street trees in the urban forest in areas of low canopy cover. Our project sustain works with middle and high school students in our region to give them hands-on, outdoor, and ecologically based learning activities. We also work to reduce the impacts of climate change by advocating for the use of clean and renewable energy.

    $128,461 spent
    15% of program spending
  4. Other programs $60,380mill creek program $266,885

    $327,265 spent
    39% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $835,228.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($560k) Expenses 100 ($557k) Net assets 100 ($170k)2018 Revenue 97 ($542k) Expenses 107 ($598k) Net assets 67 ($114k)2019 Revenue 104 ($582k) Expenses 111 ($620k) Net assets 36 ($61k)2020 Revenue 98 ($549k) Expenses 98 ($547k) Net assets 37 ($63k)2021 Revenue 98 ($549k) Expenses 105 ($584k) Net assets 16 ($28k)2022 Revenue 124 ($694k) Expenses 120 ($669k) Net assets 8 ($13k)2023 Revenue 158 ($883k) Expenses 124 ($692k) Net assets 124 ($211k)2024 Revenue 173 ($969k) Expenses 182 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($169k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (173)Expenses (182)Net assets (100)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $47k to $145k (+208%).

$173k
$119k
$64k
$65k
$47k
$145k
$232k
$256k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 59% · 2023 55% · 2024 58%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of THE LANDS COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$4k
’17
−$56k
’18
−$38k
’19
$2k
’20
−$35k
’21
$26k
’22
$190k
’23
−$42k
’24
0.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed171588181089
Joined·+1+5+2+12+2+3+2
No longer listed·312221051
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $52k → $72k.

5 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE LANDS COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE LANDS COUNCIL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 18% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

34% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE LANDS COUNCIL.

18%
largest funder
44%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 48% · 2018 44% · 2019 88% · 2020 28% · 2021 51% · 2022 33% · 2023 35% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

22% of THE LANDS COUNCIL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THE LANDS COUNCIL draws 53% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 5 states in all.

WA
OR
CA
NC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $96k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE LANDS COUNCIL's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 6 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−4% · below the median
Months of reserve0.7mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding THE LANDS COUNCIL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $10k on record.

Federal$10k
grants $10kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$10k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THE LANDS COUNCIL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 6%Fundraising 12%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE LANDS COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE LANDS COUNCIL?
THE LANDS COUNCIL (Washington) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $472,741 to it, the largest being PATAGONIAORG ($87,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE LANDS COUNCIL have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $472,741 in grants to THE LANDS COUNCIL, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE LANDS COUNCIL?
PATAGONIAORG is the largest funder on record, with $87,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE LANDS COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Lands Council →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing