Loading…
Loading…
North Carolina · Nonprofit
THE FOUNDATION OF CALDWELL COMMUNITY (North Carolina) is funded by 16 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,955,063 in grants to it, the largest being The Golden LEAF Inc ($1,098,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE FOUNDATION OF CALDWELL COMMUNITY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 351 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 351 philanthropy nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
31% of THE FOUNDATION OF CALDWELL COMMUNITY’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (84% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $4k → $25k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
9 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE FOUNDATION OF CALDWELL COMMUNITY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 15 of 16 funders by total. Association, not causation.
THE FOUNDATION OF CALDWELL COMMUNITY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 53% · 2019 81% · 2020 34% · 2021 93% · 2022 43% · 2023 35% · 2024 42% · 2025 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
50% of THE FOUNDATION OF CALDWELL COMMUNITY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE FOUNDATION OF CALDWELL COMMUNITY is locally rooted: 72% of its grant income comes from North Carolina funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 16 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
81%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 16funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing