· Public charity
Gmr Foundation for Research & Educa
The mission of gmr foundation for research and education is to support clinical, education and health systems research designed to improve the care and safety of patients in the out of hospital setting.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $171k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAEMSP | $35,000 |
| UCLA CENTER FOR PREHOSPITAL CARE | $28,578 |
| JONES COLLEGE | $28,250 |
| MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE D | $22,500 |
| UNIVERSITY ALASKA FAIRBANKS | $21,500 |
| VENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $12,600 |
| JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $12,000 |
| UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY | $11,050 |
| PIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +177% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EMS PHYSICIANS4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +177%
- MCMARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $92k · revenue +244%
- VCVENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- NNAEMSPone grant, 2020 · $31k
- UEUNIVERSITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICone grant, 2022 · $25k
OREGON TECH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation provides academic scholarships and financial support to the college.
The columbia state community college foundation encourages friends, alumni, economic partners and others to invest their time and resources toward improvement of education at columbia state community college and making higher education…
The mission of the jefferson community college foundation is to work in partnership with the college, the community and alumni to enhance the educational opportunities provided by the college.
The sole purpose of the foundation is to support south central college and its students.
Making education accessible for students through philanthropic support, aligned with Austin Community College (ACC) strategic priorities.
We make potential possible.
Increase, manage, and distribute resources for the benefit of the students, the college, and the community
To facilitate and encourage gifts to fort scott community college to support the college's mission to provide a higher education to students.
Our mission is to change lives by providing students with scholarships so they can pursue quality academic and vocational education. we do this through relationship building, fundraising and stewarding resources.
To support the mission of the colorado community college system by creating partnerships, developing resources, and advocating for the value of a community college education.
The ntc foundation develops relationships that enable individuals, businesses and the community to advocate for and provide resources in support of northcentral technical college in accomplishing its mission.
The foundation's mission is support red rocks community college in its commitment to students, learning and excellence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jefferson State Community College Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Emory University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EMS PHYSICIANS ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AIMS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF AURORA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gmr Foundation for Research & Educa funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gmr Foundation for Research & Educa?
Find your warmest path to Gmr Foundation for Research & Educa through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.