· Private foundation
Newtmont Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $480k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $455k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $200,000 |
| BOSTON COLLEGE | $105,000 |
| GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND | $50,000 |
| MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| MOUNT DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $50,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $45,000 |
| OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH AND SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC | $40,000 |
| BISHOP HIGH SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY | $25,000 |
| DE MARILLAC ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| MENTAL WELLNESS CENTER | $25,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE4× · 2022–2025 · $420k · revenue +12%- GWGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND4× · 2022–2025 · $182k · revenue +64%
- MDMOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- TOTOWN OF MOUNT DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC - SANTA BARBARA REGIONone grant, 2021 · $25k
- SSSISTERS SERVANTS OF MARY IMMACULATE PROVINCE OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.
Maine Historical Society, founded in 1822, is a private non-profit whose mission is to preserve and share Maine's story. Based in Portland, we work closely with communities and partners throughout the state, and serve a statewide and…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Seal Cove Auto Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds TOWN OF MOUNT DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VNA HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Harbor House Community Service Center ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Colket Family Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · The Edward Marthann Samek Foundation · Ethel D Colket Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · The Mitchell P Rales Family Foundation · Hattie a and Fred C Lynam Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Newtmont Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Historical Society — 22% of income from government
- Youth Development Organization Inc — 4% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Newtmont Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Newtmont Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.