Loading…
Loading…
Arizona · Nonprofit
Seeds for A Future (Arizona) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $224,006 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($127,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Seeds for A Future runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,483 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,483 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
The base broadened — 2 funders to 3 as grant income moved $31k → $37k.
3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 68% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Seeds for A Future’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Seeds for A Future leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 65% · 2019 76% · 2020 100% · 2021 69% · 2022 97% · 2023 83% · 2024 68% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Seeds for A Future draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Arizona — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 6 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
61% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing