Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

South Carolina · Nonprofit

PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION

PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION (South Carolina) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $566,509 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ($394,709). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$584k
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$567k
Grants received
$879k
Net assets
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 35%

Against its field

PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 21,584 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin31% · top quartile
Months of reserve16.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,584 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($238k) Expenses 100 ($343k) Net assets 100 ($269k)2018 Revenue 101 ($241k) Expenses 79 ($270k) Net assets 83 ($223k)2019 Revenue 98 ($235k) Expenses 71 ($243k) Net assets 81 ($219k)2020 Revenue 128 ($304k) Expenses 76 ($262k) Net assets 99 ($267k)2021 Revenue 192 ($458k) Expenses 97 ($334k) Net assets 146 ($391k)2022 Revenue 211 ($502k) Expenses 114 ($391k) Net assets 187 ($503k)2023 Revenue 249 ($593k) Expenses 116 ($398k) Net assets 260 ($698k)2024 Revenue 245 ($584k) Expenses 117 ($403k) Net assets 327 ($879k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (245)Expenses (117)Net assets (327)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 9% · 2018 21% · 2019 1% · 2020 19% · 2021 6% · 2022 6% · 2023 32% · 2024 57%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

57% of PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,813 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$105k
17
$29k
18
$8k
19
$42k
20
$125k
21
$111k
22
$196k
23
$181k
24
17
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $83k → $89k.

From the IRS filings of PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

90% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION.

70%
largest funder
93%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 88% · 2018 98% · 2019 98% · 2020 82% · 2021 54% · 2022 96% · 2023 56%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

96% of PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION's grant income comes from South Carolina funders.

NV
NC
SC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
South Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 307 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 19%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

86%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

SC

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION?
PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION (South Carolina) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $566,509 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ($394,709). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $566,509 in grants to PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION?
UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC is the largest funder on record, with $394,709 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing