Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Kansas · Nonprofit

PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION

PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION (Kansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $104,254 to it, the largest being AZURA CREDIT UNION ($60,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$995k
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$104k
Grants received
$4.9M
Net assets
2/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%

Against its field

PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 9,643 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin80% · top quartile
Months of reserve1.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)23% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,643 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($232k) Expenses 100 ($521k) Net assets 100 ($1.9M)2019 Revenue 305 ($706k) Expenses 69 ($360k) Net assets 118 ($2.3M)2020 Revenue 195 ($451k) Expenses 22 ($112k) Net assets 136 ($2.6M)2021 Revenue 479 ($1.1M) Expenses 73 ($383k) Net assets 174 ($3.3M)2022 Revenue 138 ($319k) Expenses 70 ($364k) Net assets 172 ($3.3M)2023 Revenue 336 ($779k) Expenses 53 ($276k) Net assets 198 ($3.8M)2024 Revenue 281 ($652k) Expenses 55 ($289k) Net assets 217 ($4.1M)2025 Revenue 429 ($995k) Expenses 39 ($201k) Net assets 258 ($4.9M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (429)Expenses (39)Net assets (258)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

50% of PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,078 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$289k
18
$345k
19
$339k
20
$727k
21
$45k
22
$503k
23
$363k
24
$794k
25
1.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $10k → $5k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION.

58%
largest funder
86%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 96% · 2021 80% · 2022 100% · 2023 98%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

93% of PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION's grant income comes from Kansas funders.

NE
KS
OK

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
23
Kansas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $21k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Kansas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

60%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION?
PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION (Kansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $104,254 to it, the largest being AZURA CREDIT UNION ($60,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $104,254 in grants to PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION?
AZURA CREDIT UNION is the largest funder on record, with $60,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PARKS FOR ALL FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kansas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing