Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Blanche Bryden Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$233kHealth$123kArts & Culture$121kHuman Services$118kHousing & Shelter$33kAnimals$23kInternational$20kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$22,000
SUNFLOWER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC$10,000
NOTO ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT$7,000
MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC$6,300
JAYHAWK AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC$5,000
TOPEKA LULAC MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER$3,500
GRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC$3,500
KANSAS SILENT FILM FESTIVAL INC$2,000
THE 2030 FOUNDATION OF TOPEKA INC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $3k → 14%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $3k → 14%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 14%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $3k → 14%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $3k → 14%LET'S HELP INC: $8k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION: $5k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER: $7k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER: $4k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER: $4k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER: $500 → 14%SHELTERED LIVING INC: $5k → 14%JAYHAWK AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $5k → 14%JAYHAWK AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $5k → 14%TOPEKA YOUTH PROJECT INC: $4k → 14%SHELTERED LIVING INC: $4k → 14%SHELTERED LIVING INC: $3k → 14%SHELTERED LIVING INC: $3k → 14%SHELTERED LIVING INC: $3k → 14%THE CONGREGATIONAL HOME FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%TOPEKA YOUTH PROJECT INC: $5k → 14%THE 2030 FOUNDATION OF TOPEKA INC: $2k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $12k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $8k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $6k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $5k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $4k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$655k · 29 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
12

Total granted

$655k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+12%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +262%
  • SM
    SUNFLOWER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +10%
  • SF
    STORMONT-VAIL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • VB
    VALEO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
2
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
3
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Topeka Collegiate School Inc

To prepare students for advanced education, successful careers and responsible citizenship through academic excellence and humanitarian ideals.

Education
5
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
6
South Central Community Foundation

To enhance the life, culture, and community of South Central Kansas by connecting people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
7
Interfaith Housing and Community Service

To assist low-income homeowners of south central kansas to repair/rehabilitate their homes; to assist qualified low-income residents of south central kansas to purchase homes or to build low-cost homes for these residents; and to provide…

Community Improvement
8
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
9
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
10
Dui Victims Center of Kansas Inc

Reduce the impact an impaired driving crash has on victims, survivors and their families, and increase awareness of the traumatic human consequences of the choice to drive impaired

Education
11
Southeast Kansas Mental Health Center

To provide and advocate for the highest quality whole-person care to improve the health and quality of life in our communities.

Health
12
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Topeka Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Second Chance Animal Refuge Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health & Social S…Kansas Policy & Advocacy Or…Kansas Civic & Cultural Ins…Topeka Community DevelopmentProfessional & Trade Associ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 27. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%0%<5yr9%3%5–10yr16%10%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr19%45%35–55yr24%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%0%<5yr9%0%5–10yr16%7%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr19%41%35–55yr24%42%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
8%
92/1,110

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $220,830 · EducationWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $10,000 · EducationMIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC — $37,300 · Human ServicesMIDLAND CARE CONNECT…TOPEKA LULAC MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER INC — $23,000 · Human ServicesTOPEKA LULAC MULTI-P…SHELTERED LIVING INC — $16,685 · Human ServicesSHELTERED LIVING INCEast Topeka Council on Aging Inc — $13,500 · Human ServicesEast Topeka Council …LETS HELP INC — $12,585 · Human ServicesLETS HELP INCJAYHAWK AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesJAYHAWK AREA AGENCY …TOPEKA YOUTH PROJECT INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesTOPEKA YOUTH PROJECT…COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $5,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesSUNFLOWER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureSUNFLOWER MUSIC F…NORTH TOPEKA ARTS DISTRICT INC — $26,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH TOPEKA ARTS…KANSAS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CHILDREN'S…+1 more — $2,500 · Arts & CultureMARIAN CLINIC INC — $17,740 · OtherMARIAN CLINIC INCHEAVENLY VISIONS FOUNDATION INC — $13,122 · OtherHEAVENLY VISIONS FO…VALEO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC — $10,000 · OtherVALEO BEHAVIORAL HE…KANSAS SILENT FILM FESTIVAL — $5,750 · OtherTOPEKA CENTER FOR PEACE & JUCTICE — $5,500 · OtherEAST TOPEKA SENIOR CENTER — $5,500 · OtherHousing and Credit Counseling Inc — $5,500 · OtherPATHWAY FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS INC — $20,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TOPEKA — $8,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB…+11 more — $23,400 · Other+11 moreSTORMONT-VAIL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthSTORMONT-V…GRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC — $13,500 · HealthGRACEMED H…TOPEKA RESCUE MISSION INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterCornerstone of Topeka Inc — $12,500 · Housing & ShelterHELPING HANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $13,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL REFUGE SOCIETY — $10,000 · Animals
Education$230,830Human Services$129,570Arts & Culture$110,500Other$120,012Health$63,500Housing & Shelter$27,500Animals$23,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $220,830 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSUNFLOWER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $75,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetSTORMONT-VAIL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC — $37,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TOPEKA ARTS DISTRICT INC — $26,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTOPEKA LULAC MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER INC — $23,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMARIAN CLINIC INC — $17,740 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSHELTERED LIVING INC — $16,685 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTOPEKA RESCUE MISSION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEast Topeka Council on Aging Inc — $13,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHELPING HANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLETS HELP INC — $12,585 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCornerstone of Topeka Inc — $12,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJAYHAWK AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL REFUGE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetVALEO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOPEKA YOUTH PROJECT INC — $9,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TOPEKA — $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHousing and Credit Counseling Inc — $5,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL TECHNOLOGIES INC — $3,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAPPER FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOPEKA FESTIVAL SINGERS INC — $2,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budget2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Congregational Home Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topeka Community FoundationKS53.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · United Way of Kaw Valley Inc · Lewis Humphreys Charitable Trust · Wmr Family Foundation 045351-000 Co Wilmington Trust Company · Stormont-Vail Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Schwartz Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Global Impact · Mark & Bette Morris Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blanche Bryden Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blanche Bryden Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Blanche Bryden Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph