· Public charity
Stormont-Vail Foundation
To provide voluntary gift support for stormont-vail healthcare, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $2,248,162 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,630,918 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $382,756 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $139k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STORMONT-VAIL HEALTHCARE INC | $2,023,622 |
| GEARY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY | $50,000 |
| CKF ADDICTION TREATMENT | $25,000 |
| STORMONT-VAIL HEALTH AUXILIARY | $12,500 |
| YWCA | $11,000 |
| TOPEKA NORTH OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE & GUIDANCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| MARCH OF DIMES | $10,000 |
| RACE AGAINST BREAST CANCER INC | $10,000 |
| VALEO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE | $10,000 |
| MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC | $10,000 |
| THA INC | $10,000 |
| CROSSWINDS COUNSELING AND WELLNESS | $10,000 |
| FOR THE CULTURE KS | $10,000 |
| SHAWNEE COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY HEALTH ACCESS | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHStormont-Vail Healthcare Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +28%
- BUBAKER UNIVERSITY4× · 2017–2020 · $424k · revenue +5%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- TCTOPEKA-SHAWNEE COUNTY FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $20k
- KKTWU2× · 2022–2023 · $16k
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -60%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.
Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ
To provide and advocate for the highest quality whole-person care to improve the health and quality of life in our communities.
The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.
To improve the overall health of the community through a comprehensive array of services that address the physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs of the residents of the shawnee neighborhood.
Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Childrens Service League and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 28. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Stormont-Vail Healthcare Inc ↗
- Who funds BAKER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AND GUIDANCE CENTER OF TOPEKA INC ↗
- Who funds THE RACE AGAINST BREAST CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds JAYHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC COUNCIL 197 ↗
- Who funds GEARY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEAST KANSAS ↗
- Who funds SUNFLOWER STATE GAMES INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds VALEO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds TOPEKA NORTH OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds MARIAN CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THA Inc ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NE KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds SHAWNEE COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF EAST CENTRAL KANSAS ↗
- Who funds CKF Addiction Treatment Inc ↗
- Who funds STORMONT VAIL AUXILIARY ↗
- Who funds Florence Crittenton Services of Topeka Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
- Who funds Topeka Justice Unity and Ministry Project ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS DENTAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOPEKA LULAC MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · United Way of Kaw Valley Inc · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Blanche Bryden Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Wmr Family Foundation 045351-000 Co Wilmington Trust Company · Wichita Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Lewis Humphreys Charitable Trust · Douglas County Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stormont-Vail Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.