· Private foundation
Wmr Family Foundation 045351-000 Co Wilmington Trust Company
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC | $36,630 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON | $25,000 |
| THE BAY VIEW ASSOCIATION | $23,500 |
| BLUSTEM MEADOW FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE TOPEKA ZOO INC | $9,500 |
| CULTUREWORKS | $9,500 |
| CORNERSTONE OF TOPEKA INC | $8,315 |
| ST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $7,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE | $6,000 |
| LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCY INC | $5,000 |
| TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| WEST OTTAWA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUC FOUND | $4,000 |
| JUSTICE IN MOTION INC | $4,000 |
| 2030 FOUNDATION OF TOPEKA | $3,500 |
| THE POWERHOUSE | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BAY VIEW ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH7× · 2019–2025 · $160k · revenue +23%
- UOUniversity of Dayton7× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +22%
- TKThe Kansas University Endowment Association7× · 2019–2025 · $77k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $19k
- MUMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +8%
- TCTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLANZEELAND AREAone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.
The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.
The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
To be the catalyst for economic prosperity within our community.
The greater topeka chamber of commerce mobilizes the community to speak with a highly influential voice in support of public policies that create economic success. through a robust advocacy program which includes extensive professional…
The topeka community foundation works to improve the quality of life in the topeka region through an active partnership with donors and others who wish to bring positive change through charitable giving. the foundation manages charitable…
To build & prudently manage the assets of our endowment, which will secure the joys of live theatre in our community.
Helping people move from poverty towards prosperity.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.
To provide sources of charitable support and provide funding for the establishment or support of educational, employment, economic and training opportunities designed to provide relief of the poor, distressed and underprivileged as well as…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Topeka and the most unlike its peers is Buchanan Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BAY VIEW ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds University of Dayton ↗
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
- Who funds Cornerstone of Topeka Inc ↗
- Who funds CULTUREWORKS ↗
- Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TOPEKA ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE IN MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds TOPEKA RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds I AM ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WEST OTTAWA MUSIC BOOSTERS ↗
- Who funds Top of Michigan Trails Council ↗
- Who funds FALLING FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds 2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOORSTEP INC ↗
- Who funds LETS HELP INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TOPEKA ↗
- Who funds BUCHANAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOPEKA SWIM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KANSAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · United Way of Kaw Valley Inc · Blanche Bryden Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Stormont-Vail Foundation · Mark & Bette Morris Family Foundation · Lewis Humphreys Charitable Trust · Douglas County Community Foundation · Global Impact · One Gas Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Walter E & Lucy M Roush Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wmr Family Foundation 045351-000 Co Wilmington Trust Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.