Skip to content

Minnesota · Nonprofit

NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY

NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY (Minnesota) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $85,000 to it, the largest being McDougal Foundation ($47,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$59k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$85k
Net assets
$52k
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%
01What it does

What Nepal Tiger Conservancy does

Mission

To monitor and protect the tiger population

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Long term tiger monitoring(lttm-chitwan): the lttm is one of our main research programs, supported since its inception. This program funds two full-time tiger trackers who monitor tigers using camera trapping and pugmark methodologies. Individual tigers are identified, and their residency, reproductive and survival statuses are documented over time. In addition to field personnel, the program covers field expenses and equipment, including camera traps and related field gear.

    $16,100 spentof which $18,600 as grants
    45% of program spending
  2. Participatory anti-poaching unit(papu-bardia): this program is one of the main community-based anti poaching initiatives in bardia national park, implemented in partnership with the national trust for nature conservation. It focuses on controlling illegal wildlife poaching in buffer zones and corridor habitats by involving local youths in anti-poaching operations alongside national park management staff and armed park securities forces. The project helps establish community-based anti-poaching units(cbapus) under the supervision of buffer zone user committees and national park management. The program provides training, field gear, communication tools, snacks during patrols, and covers maintenance costs for bicycles and fuel for motorbikes and vehicles used in anti-poaching activities.

    $10,000 spentof which $10,100 as grants
    28% of program spending
  3. Participatory anti-poaching alliances(papa-chitwan): following the sucess of the papu project in bardia, the papa project was established in chitwan, specially at the meghauli buffer zone user committee. It supports cbapu groups in the chitwan buffer zone by providing training, forming effective cbapu groups, organizing regular alliance meetings, and conducting collaboratives patrols. The program also supplies field gear, including bicyles and binoculars.

    $6,500 spentof which $7,060 as grants
    18% of program spending
  4. Conservation awareness- chitwan: this program raises tiger conservation awareness in local schools and communities within the buffer zone of chitwan national park. It also provides field experiences for international visitors. In local schools and communities, tiger documentaries, research findings, and conservation results are presented. International visitors are encouraged to participate in field project activities, experience local community cultures, and gain firsthand experiences, thereby enhancing overall tiger conservation efforts.

    $2,950 spentof which $3,550 as grants
    8% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $35,550.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($103k) Expenses 100 ($68k) Net assets 100 ($54k)2024 Revenue 69 ($71k) Expenses 114 ($78k) Net assets 88 ($48k)2025 Revenue 57 ($59k) Expenses 80 ($54k) Net assets 97 ($52k)
202320242025
Revenue (57)Expenses (80)Net assets (97)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $54k to $48k (−12%).

$54k
$48k
$52k
202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

97% of NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,580 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$35k
’23
−$7k
’24
$5k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $13k → $9k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
'26*
total
funders
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1

From the IRS filings of NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

55%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 77% · 2018 56% · 2019 100% · 2020 60% · 2021 56% · 2022 56% · 2023 56% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Minnesota, across 1 state in all.

CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,315 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin8% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−24% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,315 animals nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY?
NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY (Minnesota) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $85,000 to it, the largest being McDougal Foundation ($47,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $85,000 in grants to NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY?
McDougal Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $47,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NEPAL TIGER CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Nepal Tiger Conservancy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2023–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing