Minnesota · Nonprofit
CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION
CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION (Minnesota) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,112 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($9,846). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2024
- $57k
- Funders on record
- 3
- Grants received
- $10k
- Net assets
- $141k
What Conservation Beyond Borders Foundation does
Mission
Promote collaborative education and research designed to benefit local communities and optimize ecosystem management and integrity.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.
Programs
Field hospital operations cbb works to protect and save wildlife. Wildlife vets play a critical role in assisting with the preservation of wildlife species. It is for that reason that cbb is supporting african wildlife vets by assisting with the funding of a full-time vet. Each case they handled remains crucial to wildlife conservation. Throughout the year, dr. Jenifer and dr. Dave provided critical care to numerous animals, many of which were injured by poachers or snare traps. A veterinary field hospital was established, which is now actively providing essential care to wildlife in need. This boma services the surrounding national reserves. Prides of lions and packs of wild dogs inhabited the hospital for most months. Various field operations were conducted to provide an immediate response to injured wildlife. Examples of injured wildlife include but are not restricted to animals caught in snares and rhinos surviving poachers.
$3,550 spent8% of program spendingAnti-poaching workshops and research - anti-poaching workshops were done with governmental officials, reserve managers, wildlife rangers, and wildlife-wildlife conflict resolution personal in rwanda and uganda with the objective to create conservation guidelines and frameworks for mountain gorillas. In 2024, rhinos, cheetahs and lions were introduced into habitats where they have previously gone extinct, mainly due to poaching and hwc throughout africa and india. In depth conversations with reformed poachers, law enforcement, gorilla rangers, and community members yield a deeper understanding of incentives that can promote conversation, in addition to challenges that serve to solve conservation shortcomings in effective frameworks. Practices such as dehorning rhinos, microchipping tigers, and collaring elephants, cheetahs, and lions were employed with the goal of removing the incentive to poach and increasing the effectiveness of conservation strategies.
$15,000 spent35% of program spendingAnimal rescues - veterinary support was provided to hluhluwe imfolozi park and umkhuze game reserve. We successfully released several cheetahs back into the wild as part of ongoing efforts to bolster the species' population in protected areas. In 2024, lions and pangolins saved from the illegal wildlife trade were reintroduced into safe habitats. Collaring is an important part of managing and protecting lion, african wild dog and cheetah populations in small, fenced protected areas. It is instrumental in finding animals with snares on them as well as locating animals that have left the boundaries of protected areas. Tracking and monitoring these predators can help reserve ecologists and managers determine the genetics of their populations, which will assist in ascertaining the need to relocate to avoid inbreeding.
$24,673 spent57% of program spending
The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $43,223.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $132k to $107k (−19%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
97% of CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (92% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $200 → $18.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 98% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 97% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
98% of CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $200 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Minnesota funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,152 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,152 environment nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Organizations like CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Minnesota
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
73%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION?
- CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION (Minnesota) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,112 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($9,846). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $10,112 in grants to CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION?
- PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND is the largest funder on record, with $9,846 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing