Skip to content

Wisconsin · Public charity

Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc

Michael fields agricultural institute's mission is to help rural and urban farms and agricultural communities in wisconsin and beyond be healthy environmentally, economically, and socially.

$733k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Itemized grants FY2024
12
Organizations funded FY2023
42%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$534k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$41,769
Largest grant, FY2024
$107,629
Organizations funded a year
12 to 13
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$3.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 42% of the organizations Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 55% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$534k22%
FY202312$596k42%
FY202213$278kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$555kFood & Nutrition$536kPhilanthropy$197kEnvironment$72kYouth Development$17kCommunity Improvement$16kMembership Benefit$16k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Renewing the Countryside$262,82835%
Wisconsin Farmers Union Foundation$205,868224%
Global Philanthropy Partnership$197,44031%
Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System$100,5861n/a
Neighborhood Food Solutions Inc$86,6703n/a
Marbleseed Inc$75,10431%
The Motherland Gardens Community Project$45,947228%
Groundswell Conservancy Inc$42,26531%
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System$27,3161n/a
Western Wisconsin Conservation Council$19,4871n/a
Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Renewing the Countryside$262,82835%
Wisconsin Farmers Union Foundation$205,868224%
Global Philanthropy Partnership$197,44031%
Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System$100,5861n/a
Neighborhood Food Solutions Inc$86,6703n/a
Marbleseed Inc$75,10431%
The Motherland Gardens Community Project$45,947228%
Groundswell Conservancy Inc$42,26531%
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System$27,3161n/a
Western Wisconsin Conservation Council$19,4871n/a
Regents of the University of Minnesota$16,8151n/a
Latino Economic Development Center$16,00010%
Advocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp$8,50011%

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($304k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenewing the Countryside: $262,828 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetWisconsin Farmers Union Foundation: $205,868 over 2y, 24% of budgetGlobal Philanthropy Partnership: $197,440 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMarbleseed Inc: $75,104 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetThe Motherland Gardens Community Project: $45,947 over 2y, 28% of budgetGroundswell Conservancy Inc: $42,265 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLatino Economic Development Center: $16,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAdvocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp: $8,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The McKnight FoundationMN15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The McKnight Foundation · Bradshaw-Knight Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc with peer funders

About Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc

How much does Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc give?
Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc reported 9 itemized grants totaling $534,373, out of $733,198 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 13 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (39%), Food & Nutrition (38%), Philanthropy (14%).
Who are Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Renewing the Countryside ($263k), Wisconsin Farmers Union Foundation ($206k), Global Philanthropy Partnership ($197k).
Does Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 42% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The McKnight Foundation, Bradshaw-Knight Foundation Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc based?
Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael Fields Agricultural Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph