Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS (Maryland) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $198,827 to it, the largest being The George Washington University ($198,827). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$911k
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$199k
Net assets
$3.5M
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Medical Technology and Practice Patterns does

Mission

Founded in 1986, mtppi is a research organization specializing in health service research, education and health policy analysis of new and emerging technologies.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Researching barriers to arteriovenous fistula use in black hemodialysis patients in collaboration with the university of alabama at birminghamin the final year of the 5-year r01 project we conducted two major research tasks. The first major task was to examine the avf and avg maturation and maintenance procedural burden among patients who initiate with a cvc with a longer follow-up than had previously been published and that incorporates all subsequent accesses and procedures (if the first one failed). Specifically, in 2024 we examined four clinical scenarios in the first year after surgical access creation: (1) maintain primary patency, (2) primary patency loss, (3) secondary patency loss after avf/avg use, and (4) avf/avg nonuse. We also included costs associated with all surgical and percutaneous vascular access procedures for the duration of patient follow-up, including procedures occurring after the first access failed. Vascular access costs, including the cost of the index avf creation, were calculated for years 1, 2 and 3 after the index avf/avg creation date and total 3 years after initial va creation. This study - which we are currently in the process of writing up --…

    $44,588 spent
    6% of program spending
  2. Gilead co-us-998-7081 evaluating gender specific disparities in the viral hepatitis cascade:in this period the primary objective was to examine timely treatment of chronic hepatitis b (chb) given the reduction in risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gaps in timely treatment have historically persisted, especially among underserved safety-net populations. We aimed to evaluate gaps and disparities in chb treatment in the united states. Adults with treatment-naive chb without human immunodeficiency virus were identified from 2010 to 2018 across 3 safety-net health systems. Chb treatment eligibility was assessed using american association for the study of liver diseases (aasld) criteria and alternative criteria, including the simplified approach for hepatitis b algorithm. Differences in chb treatment between groups were evaluated using ?2 methods, adjusted kaplan-meier methods, and adjusted cox proportional hazards models.we found that among 3749 patients with treatment-naive chb (51.5% women, 38.7% white, 33.7% african american, 19.6% asian, 24.6% cirrhosis), 30.0% were aasld treatment eligible, among whom 31.0% were treated. Men were more likely than women to be treated…

    $135,573 spent
    18% of program spending
  3. Nimhd r01 md017063-01 racial and ethnic disparities in hcc surveillancein 2024, we focused on two research aims: aim 1 was to evaluate gaps and disparities in hcc surveillance among adults with cirrhosis across four safety-net health systems in the u.s. We identified adults with cirrhosis from march 1, 2017 to february 28, 2022 across four safety-net health systems in california, florida, ohio, and texas. Cirrhosis was identified using established definitions based on icd-9/10 codes. Patients with baseline hcc diagnosis were excluded. The primary outcome was receipt of hcc surveillance imaging (ultrasound, ct, or mri scans of the abdomen) within first 6 months (hcc6mo) of cirrhosis diagnosis during the study period. Among a multi-center safety-net cohort of cirrhosis patients, over 70% received some form of abdominal imaging within 6 months, but less than 30% received imaging specifically for an indication of hcc surveillance. We concluded that significant disparities in hcc surveillance were observed across sociodemographic factors. These findings were presented at the 2024 american association for the study of liver diseases (aasld) conference: gaps and disparities in…

    $129,853 spent$71,596 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  4. Hospital acquired infections in hemodialysis populationmtppi researchers worked as subcontractors to lifespan health to research hospital acquired infections in hemodialysis patient population.

    $309,228 spent$125,263 earned by the program
    42% of program spending
  5. Amgen 16465587169 cadaveric kidney transplantation outcomes among dialysis and gout patientsin 2024, mtppi continued its collaboration with amgen examining the role of gout across the dialysis-waitlist-transplant continuum in the united states. Specifically, using usrds standard analytic files from 2016-2021 linked with medicare claims and transplant registry data, the team finalized construction of three national longitudinal cohorts representing incident dialysis patients, transplant waitlist candidates, and first kidney transplant recipients. Monthly expanded data structures were developed to model gout as a time-varying exposure based on validated icd-10 codes, while capturing contemporaneous changes in hospitalization patterns, cardiovascular events, and comorbidity burden. These data supported implementation of marginal structural models with stabilized inverse-probability weights to address confounding from both baseline and time-varying clinical factors.the analyses performed in 2024 revealed that gout is associated with consistently adverse outcomes across the kidney failure and transplant continuum. Among patients initiating dialysis, gout was linked to substantially…

    $84,581 spent
    11% of program spending
  6. Write off uncollected receivable

    $36,000 spent
    5% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $739,823.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.3M) Net assets 100 ($4.9M)2018 Revenue 71 ($792k) Expenses 98 ($1.3M) Net assets 84 ($4.1M)2019 Revenue 80 ($890k) Expenses 102 ($1.3M) Net assets 84 ($4.1M)2020 Revenue 91 ($1.0M) Expenses 98 ($1.3M) Net assets 88 ($4.3M)2021 Revenue 78 ($865k) Expenses 94 ($1.2M) Net assets 88 ($4.3M)2022 Revenue 87 ($968k) Expenses 86 ($1.1M) Net assets 71 ($3.5M)2023 Revenue 76 ($848k) Expenses 86 ($1.1M) Net assets 72 ($3.5M)2024 Revenue 82 ($911k) Expenses 88 ($1.1M) Net assets 72 ($3.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (82)Expenses (88)Net assets (72)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $5.2M to $4.4M (−16%).

$5.2M
$4.4M
$4.6M
$4.9M
$4.7M
$4.0M
$4.1M
$4.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 35% · 2018 26% · 2019 22% · 2022 36% · 2023 56%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

50% of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,893 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$168k
’17
−$472k
’18
−$421k
’19
−$246k
’20
−$343k
’21
−$139k
’22
−$260k
’23
−$214k
’24
3.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed99677777
Joined·+0+1+2+1+5+2+0
No longer listed·0411520
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $68k → $36k.

Funder
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland, across 1 state in all.

VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’22
’23
Maryland out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS's revenue fell 18% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−24% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve3.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,754 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $254k on record.

Federal$254k
grants $254kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$254k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 34%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
75%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

74%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Digital Wellness Technology Incorporated · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS?
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS (Maryland) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $198,827 to it, the largest being The George Washington University ($198,827). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $198,827 in grants to MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS?
The George Washington University is the largest funder on record, with $198,827 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE PATTERNS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Medical Technology and Practice Patterns →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing