Skip to content

Minnesota · Nonprofit

KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE

KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE (Minnesota) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $285,535 to it, the largest being The McKnight Foundation ($200,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$389k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$286k
Net assets
$258k
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 31%
01What it does

What Kulture Klub Collaborative does

Mission

The mission of Kulture Klub Collaborative is to provide a safe consistent space for youth experiencing homelessness to freely enjoy access to the arts. At KKC we believe that everyone is an artist. We expose, educate, and empower youth through quality multidisciplinary art experiences. We use art and creativity as a positive force in their lives for personal growth, social justice, actionable compassion, and community improvement

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Breaking Barriers with AI: AI Technology and training is not an art and music tool that is easily accessible to homeless youth. It can be cost-prohibitive, as most homeless youth do not have access to necessary hardware, software, and training. Because AI is currently a major emerging art technology, it is critical for emerging artists to learn its implications and how to use it. This is particularly important for homeless youth, who often struggle to stay up-to-date on art and technology trends that can provide meaningful knowledge and economic opportunity. Over the course of the residency we introduced the youth to the process of creating a 3-5 minute music video using AI and 3D software, animation software, and animation characters, backgrounds, and HDRI worlds. Each youth created their own unique videos and characters, and were able to access the programming at whatever level felt comfortable to them. We provided multiple ways to engage ranging from simple character animation to full-on video production and allowed youth to select a participation style that matched their learning and engagement levels. Youth and the teaching artist also produced three AI music videos tutorials…

    $10,303 spent
    6% of program spending
  2. Capturing Homelessness: Shining Light on Our Perspectives Photography Project. 54 youth participated in this program which aimed to raise awareness and understanding of the challenges faced by homeless youth. Participants received instruction in photography skills and they explored their surroundings to capture moments that resonate with their experiences. They presented their work to friends, family, and interested parties sharing their personal reflections and thoughts in Kulture Klub's gallery space. This project was designed for youth experiencing homelessness, many of whom face historical trauma and limited access to the arts. KKC has sought guidance from local photographer Roosevelt Mansfield, who has his work displayed not only on the streets of Minneapolis, but around the globe

    $7,402 spent
    4% of program spending
  3. Creative Arts Therapy: This program was led by Pauline Moll, an artist and licensed Creative Arts Therapist. The goal of our Creative Arts Therapy program was to provide accessible, arts-based therapeutic practices that support our youth in building skills that help them manage their mental health and improve their life circumstances. Over the run of the program we have experienced consistent growth in attendance and positive outcomes. Because our programming is drop-in based, each week's Creative Arts Therapy programming day differed from the week before, bringing different youth together in community to participate in the day's activities. Each session was a mix of regular attendees and new attendees who participated in warm up exercises such as a question-of-the-day or a group game that relaxed the youth and built trust. Following the warm up, the youth worked on an art-based activity, either separately or as a group, then reflected and discussed their work and feelings and insights. Afterwards, youth were welcome to stay in our studio space and socialize, continue their art activity, or engage in another art-based activity. 125+ youth were able to benefit from Creative Arts…

    $27,532 spent
    15% of program spending
  4. Ongoing mission focused programming that engages art and artistic practice to provide enriching multidisciplinary opportunities for youth experiencing homelessness and artists to grow individually and to transform community

    $140,946 spent$61,602 earned by the program
    76% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $186,183.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($265k) Expenses 100 ($142k) Net assets 100 ($239k)2018 Revenue 57 ($150k) Expenses 159 ($226k) Net assets 68 ($163k)2019 Revenue 96 ($254k) Expenses 195 ($277k) Net assets 59 ($140k)2020 Revenue 68 ($180k) Expenses 141 ($200k) Net assets 50 ($120k)2021 Revenue 100 ($265k) Expenses 162 ($229k) Net assets 65 ($156k)2022 Revenue 98 ($260k) Expenses 145 ($206k) Net assets 88 ($210k)2023 Revenue 87 ($230k) Expenses 202 ($286k) Net assets 64 ($154k)2024 Revenue 147 ($389k) Expenses 200 ($285k) Net assets 108 ($258k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (147)Expenses (200)Net assets (108)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $155k to $259k (+67%).

$243k
$168k
$147k
$151k
$186k
$213k
$155k
$259k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 44% · 2019 36% · 2021 13% · 2022 36% · 2023 38% · 2024 47%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$123k
’17
−$76k
’18
−$23k
’19
−$20k
’20
$36k
’21
$54k
’22
−$56k
’23
$104k
’24
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Siddeeqah Shabazz

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

201720192021202220232024
Listed967655
Joined···+1+1+0
No longer listed···220
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $5k → $25k.

Funder
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
1

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

70%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 71% · 2021 71% · 2022 93% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE's grant income comes from Minnesota funders.

MN

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 17,936 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin27% · top quartile
Months of reserve2.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,936 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

65% of spending goes to programs.

Program 65%Management 21%Fundraising 13%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

32%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE?
KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE (Minnesota) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $285,535 to it, the largest being The McKnight Foundation ($200,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $285,535 in grants to KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE?
The McKnight Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KULTURE KLUB COLLABORATIVE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Kulture Klub Collaborative →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing