Skip to content

Oklahoma · Nonprofit

KISS Institute for Practical Robotics

KISS Institute for Practical Robotics (Oklahoma) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $180,078 to it, the largest being INFOSYS FOUNDATION USA ($119,600). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.3M
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$180k
Net assets
$931k
6/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%
01What it does

What KISS Institute for Practical Robotics does

Mission

Our mission is to improve the public's understanding of science, technology, engineering, and math; develop the skills, character, and aspirations of students; and contribute to the enrichment of our school systems, communities, and the nation.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Botball Educational Robotics Program: The Botball Educational Robotics Program engages middle and high school aged students in a team-oriented robotics competition, and serves as a perfect way to meet today's new common core standards. It serves over 6,000 students per year in 13 US regions and 3 International regions. By designing, building, programming, and documenting robots, students use science, engineering, technology, math, and writing skills in a hands-on project that reinforces their learning. Students are exposed to an inquiry-based, learn-by-doing activity that appeals to their hearts as well as their minds. Botball addresses our nation's need for a well-prepared, creative, yet disciplined workforce with leadership and teamwork experience.

    $691,774 spent$435,244 earned by the program
    62% of program spending
  2. Junior Botball Challenge: The program provides professional development to elementary educators (K-5) to enable them to teach their students to write computer code. Curriculum is aligned to science and math standards and vertically aligned to concepts and skills in middle and high school. The program focuses on discrete programming skills and engineering design concepts designed to improve computational thinking skills and promote mastery. The program culminates in a one-day public event where students showcase their robot designs and solutions.

    $312,365 spent$272,451 earned by the program
    28% of program spending
  3. Global Conference on Educational Robotics (GCER): The Global Conference on Educational Robotics (GCER), produced by KISS Institute for Practical Robotics, is a professional conference designed for middle and high school students, their teachers and mentors, technology education professionals, robot enthusiasts, and invited professional guests. The GCER gives attendees the inspiration and experience of a professional conference, encouraging students to further their knowledge, network with other students from around the world and pursue related careers. Teachers and mentors have many opportunities to network, exchange best practices and develop new approaches to STEM education.

    $117,335 spentof which $2,000 as grants$33,552 earned by the program
    10% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,121,474.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($733k)2018 Revenue 101 ($1.7M) Expenses 103 ($1.7M) Net assets 110 ($806k)2019 Revenue 94 ($1.6M) Expenses 110 ($1.8M) Net assets 87 ($640k)2020 Revenue 77 ($1.3M) Expenses 75 ($1.2M) Net assets 79 ($581k)2021 Revenue 48 ($819k) Expenses 44 ($717k) Net assets 93 ($684k)2022 Revenue 73 ($1.3M) Expenses 61 ($988k) Net assets 129 ($946k)2023 Revenue 87 ($1.5M) Expenses 95 ($1.5M) Net assets 125 ($913k)2024 Revenue 76 ($1.3M) Expenses 80 ($1.3M) Net assets 127 ($931k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (76)Expenses (80)Net assets (127)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $1.1M to $1.4M (+26%).

$807k
$906k
$809k
$888k
$1.1M
$1.4M
$1.3M
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 27% · 2018 21% · 2019 16% · 2020 20% · 2021 37% · 2022 21% · 2023 25% · 2024 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

50% of KISS Institute for Practical Robotics’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,352 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$101k
’17
$73k
’18
−$166k
’19
$118k
’20
$102k
’21
$263k
’22
−$33k
’23
$17k
’24
4.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Steve Goodgame

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed98766666
Joined·+0+2+0+2+2+2+1
No longer listed·1312221
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $2k → $57k.

3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KISS Institute for Practical Robotics’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KISS Institute for Practical Robotics leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

66%
largest funder
88%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 91% · 2020 78% · 2021 82% · 2022 61% · 2023 86% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

KISS Institute for Practical Robotics draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Oklahoma, across 2 states in all.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oklahoma out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $36k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

KISS Institute for Practical Robotics is better cushioned than half of the 11,752 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve4.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,752 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding KISS Institute for Practical Robotics receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $3.3M on record — $3.3M federal, $6k state.

Federal$3.3M
grants $3.3Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration$3.3M
State$6k
12
16
Top programs
  • Admin Mgmt-Gen.Mgmt Consulting$5k
  • Educational Supplies$500

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like KISS Institute for Practical Robotics

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oklahoma

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 14%Fundraising 2%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

76%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OK

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KISS Institute for Practical Robotics: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KISS Institute for Practical Robotics?
KISS Institute for Practical Robotics (Oklahoma) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $180,078 to it, the largest being INFOSYS FOUNDATION USA ($119,600). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KISS Institute for Practical Robotics have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $180,078 in grants to KISS Institute for Practical Robotics, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KISS Institute for Practical Robotics?
INFOSYS FOUNDATION USA is the largest funder on record, with $119,600 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KISS Institute for Practical Robotics find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oklahoma. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds KISS Institute for Practical Robotics →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing