Skip to content

Alaska · Nonprofit

KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY

KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY (Alaska) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $96,754 to it, the largest being Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ($72,716). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2023
$38k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$97k
Net assets
$49k
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 98%
01What it does

What Kachemak Bay Conservation Society does

Mission

The Kachemak Bay Conservation Society's mission is to protect the environment of the Kachemak Bay region and greater Alaska by encouraging sustainable use and stewardship of natural resources through advocacy, education, information, and collaboration. Kachemak Bay Conservation Society is concerned with environmental protection of the Kachemak Bay region. The organization focuses on habitat and wildlife issues, wetlands protection, water quality, logging, oil and gas leases, energy conservation, sustainability issues, and land use planning. The Society monitors environmental issues locally and statewide.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Homer Youth Conservation Activities and Recycling Support

    $0 spent
  2. Alaskans Know Climate Change project to educate the general public and to elevate an awareness of climate change issues. Outreach is nationwide through the website at https://www.alaskansknowclimatechange.com/.

    $0 spent
  3. Providing oversight and assistance to community conservation efforts through comment writing, attending meetings and events, and following legislative actions that impact conservation directly.

    $0 spent
  4. Homer Drawdown Project--Peatlands. KBCS has partnered with the Kachemak Heritage Land Trust, the Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies, Cook Inlet Keeper, and other agencies to focus on protecting peatland areas to conserve water and water quality as well as to preserve moose habitat. This project also focuses on minimizing human impact on water drainage into Kachemak Bay.

    $0 spentof which $7,900 as grants
  5. Overlook Park Oversight Manager--To protect the interests of Overlook Park

    $0 spent
  6. City of Homer Green Infrastructure Project. KBCS is providing consultation services to the City of Homer helping to guide the city in choosing sustainable projects to create a natural greenbelt within the city. The city has provided a fund for the consultation services and reimburses for the time required to perform the service.

    $0 spentof which $7,830 as grants

The 6 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $0.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($722k) Expenses 100 ($780k) Net assets 100 ($88k)2018 Revenue 100 ($718k) Expenses 97 ($759k) Net assets 55 ($48k)2019 Revenue 1 ($9k) Expenses 4 ($31k) Net assets 30 ($26k)2020 Revenue 5 ($38k) Expenses 5 ($40k) Net assets 28 ($25k)2021 Revenue 6 ($40k) Expenses 2 ($18k) Net assets 53 ($47k)2022 Revenue 9 ($63k) Expenses 8 ($64k) Net assets 53 ($46k)2023 Revenue 5 ($38k) Expenses 5 ($35k) Net assets 55 ($49k)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (5)Expenses (5)Net assets (55)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $95k to $50k (−48%).

$95k
$50k
$26k
$25k
$47k
$46k
$49k
2017201820192020202120222023
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

−$58k
’17
−$40k
’18
−$22k
’19
−$1k
’20
$22k
’21
−$338
’22
$2k
’23
0.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20172018
Listed77
Joined·+0
No longer listed·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $5 → $9k.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
3
3
2

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 25% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY.

75%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 69% · 2022 75% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Alaska, across 1 state in all.

MA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Alaska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $24k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alaska

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

67%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY?
KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY (Alaska) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $96,754 to it, the largest being Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ($72,716). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $96,754 in grants to KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY?
Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc is the largest funder on record, with $72,716 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KACHEMAK BAY CONSERVATION SOCIETY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alaska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing