Oklahoma · Nonprofit
INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK
INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK (Oklahoma) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $42,619 to it, the largest being United Way of Canadian County Inc ($19,293). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $1.1M
- Funders on record
- 6
- Grants received
- $43k
- Net assets
- $1.1M
What Intervention & Crisis Advocacy Network does
Mission
Twenty-four hour crisis line, temporary emergency shelter, counseling and other assistance for victims of domestic and sexual violence & assualt.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Emergency services: crisis line calls & crisis intervention; temporary shelter, food, clothing, supplies and transportation
$499,612 spentof which $75,458 as grants80% of program spendingSupport service: counseling & support groups, peer groups referrals, outside counsultants, child care & public education programs.
$124,906 spentof which $18,865 as grants20% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $624,518.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $800k to $1.1M (+37%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 100% · 2018 78% · 2019 89% · 2020 88% · 2021 91% · 2022 91% · 2023 89% · 2024 88% · 2025 70%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $19k → $35.
3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 31% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
77% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 62% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
83% of INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK's grant income comes from Oklahoma funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Government funding INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $111k on record.
- Pmts-Local Gov't-Hlth,Soc Svc$111k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oklahoma
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
77% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK?
- INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK (Oklahoma) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $42,619 to it, the largest being United Way of Canadian County Inc ($19,293). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $42,619 in grants to INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK?
- United Way of Canadian County Inc is the largest funder on record, with $19,293 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oklahoma. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Intervention & Crisis Advocacy Network →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing