North Carolina · Nonprofit
Inclusive Development International
Inclusive Development International (North Carolina) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,468,295 to it, the largest being THE SCHMIDT FAMILY FOUNDATION ($2,155,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $3.1M
- Funders on record
- 17
- Grants received
- $6.5M
- Net assets
- $2.2M
What Inclusive Development International does
Mission
Inclusive Development International supports communities around the world to defend their rights and resources in the face of harmful corporate activities and internationally financed development projects, and we advocate for a more just and equitable global economy. We are working toward a world in ecological balance, in which communities and individuals determine their own development paths, and businesses respect their human rights and environmental responsibilities.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
CASE WORK AND CAPACITY BUILDING: At the request of community advocates worldwide, we investigate corporations, investors, and supply chain actors linked to harmful activities and identify where pressure can drive change. We also train and equip civil society organizations with tools and digital resources to conduct their own investigations and advocacy. In select cases, we go further, partnering with community organizations to design and implement sustained, multi-pronged advocacy strategies aimed at preventing harm and securing redress. . CASE WORK AND CAPACITY BUILDING: In 2024 our researchers opened new avenues for communities to defend their rights by investigating the investment and supply chains of 50 harmful projects in nine countries, along with regional projects in Asia and Africa and one global investigation of the palm oil sector. Participants in our training courses investigated an additional 36 projects in 11 countries with our help. Altogether this research uncovered 151 new advocacy opportunities for communities in 18 countries, which we and our partners helped communities seize in 25 cases. This year we secured 24 important case wins and remedial or preventative…
$2,095,320 spent$1,749,974 earned by the program85% of program spendingPOLICY ADVOCACY: Our current five-year strategy, launched in 2023, focuses on ensuring that the global energy transition is both rapid and just. In 2024, we advanced this work by amplifying the voices of affected community voices in global policy conversation about a just energy transition, pushing for stronger human rights due diligence within the aluminium supply chain , and joining partners to campaign for an end to coal finance. . Key policy accomplishments in 2024 included the following: . -----We filed the first OECD complaint of its kind against the three biggest ESG ratings and index firms for failing to uphold their human rights responsibilities. Our End Coal Finance campaign exposed how a $600 million Asian Development Bank loan meant to promote clean energy in Indonesia helped bankroll coal plants across the archipelago. We also published research identifying the commercial banks most likely to finance a wave of new coal power projects planned across Asia. Sixteen banks responded by ruling out financing the pipeline coal projects we identified. . -----We launched a new initiative to document and amplify the perspectives of frontline communities on what a just approach…
$379,856 spent$229,993 earned by the program15% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,475,176.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $2.2M to $5.9M (+171%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
96% of Inclusive Development International’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
David Pred
President & Executive Director
Board chair
Jean du Plessis
Chair
As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $609k → $1.1M.
5 of 17 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Inclusive Development International’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Inclusive Development International leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 65%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 71% · 2019 63% · 2020 45% · 2021 29% · 2022 47% · 2023 29% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
50% of Inclusive Development International's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
Inclusive Development International draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside North Carolina, across 6 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $552k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
Inclusive Development International holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,608 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,608 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Organizations like Inclusive Development International
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In North Carolina
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
85% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Inclusive Development International: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Inclusive Development International?
- Inclusive Development International (North Carolina) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,468,295 to it, the largest being THE SCHMIDT FAMILY FOUNDATION ($2,155,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Inclusive Development International have?
- IRS filings report 17 organizations giving $6,468,295 in grants to Inclusive Development International, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Inclusive Development International?
- THE SCHMIDT FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,155,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Inclusive Development International find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Inclusive Development International →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 17 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing