Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

IN THE NAME OF GRACE

IN THE NAME OF GRACE (Missouri) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $195,697 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ($79,849). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$219k
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$196k
Net assets
$196k
4/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 16%
01What it does

What In the Name of Grace does

Mission

To support sober living in the kansas city, mo area.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Our program services support the oxford houses within kansas city, mo and the surrounding areas. We fund the outreach worker that oversees the houses through an annual contract with oxford house (ohi). We maintain 20 sober houses and have over 180 beds through oxford that didn't exist before grace.

    $175,875 spentof which $175,875 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $175,875.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($111k) Expenses 100 ($92k) Net assets 100 ($138k)2022 Revenue 185 ($205k) Expenses 160 ($148k) Net assets 141 ($196k)2023 Revenue 144 ($159k) Expenses 165 ($152k) Net assets 147 ($203k)2024 Revenue 197 ($219k) Expenses 246 ($226k) Net assets 142 ($196k)
2021202220232024
Revenue (197)Expenses (246)Net assets (142)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $138k to $196k (+41%).

$138k
$196k
$203k
$196k
2021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of IN THE NAME OF GRACE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,893 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$19k
’21
$57k
’22
$8k
’23
−$7k
’24
10
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202220232024
Listed777
Joined·+1+0
No longer listed·10
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $7k → $1k.

4 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 37% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of IN THE NAME OF GRACE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

IN THE NAME OF GRACE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund IN THE NAME OF GRACE.

41%
largest funder
83%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 82% · 2019 51% · 2020 59% · 2021 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

67% of IN THE NAME OF GRACE's grant income comes from Missouri funders.

MO
KS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $73k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

IN THE NAME OF GRACE has grown faster than three-quarters of the 13,754 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · below the median
Months of reserve10.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)25% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,754 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like IN THE NAME OF GRACE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 0%Fundraising 22%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MO

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for IN THE NAME OF GRACE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds IN THE NAME OF GRACE?
IN THE NAME OF GRACE (Missouri) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $195,697 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ($79,849). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does IN THE NAME OF GRACE have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $195,697 in grants to IN THE NAME OF GRACE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of IN THE NAME OF GRACE?
United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc is the largest funder on record, with $79,849 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like IN THE NAME OF GRACE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing