Loading…
Loading…
Tennessee · Nonprofit
Hope Through Him Ministries (Tennessee) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $27,118 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Hope Through Him Ministries has grown faster than half of the 7,584 religion nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,584 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2019
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
97% of Hope Through Him Ministries’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (98% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $48 → $27k.
3 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Hope Through Him Ministries’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Hope Through Him Ministries leans on a few funders — its largest provides 74% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2022 74% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Hope Through Him Ministries draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Tennessee — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
91% of spending goes to programs.
94%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2017–2019), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing