Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Laskin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$2.3MEducation$362kPhilanthropy$304kFood & Nutrition$150kHealth$132kHuman Services$61kYouth Development$25kEnvironment$19k
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $780k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULAROSA HIGH SCHOOL$240,000
MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$210,000
STEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC$150,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC$80,000
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC$50,000
HISTORIC HAYMARKET MILWAUKEE INC$50,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC$45,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC$20,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC$17,500
UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND$15,000
ALVERNO COLLEGE$15,000
MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER$12,500
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC$12,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC$10,000
PRESENT MUSIC INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAINT JOHNS COMMUNITIES INC: $15k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 17%SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 27 repeat orgs$432k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
5

Total granted

$2.9M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+25%

Still filing today

85%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $410k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $320k · revenue +16%
  • MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $157k · revenue +20%
  • HH
    Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • SJ
    SAINT JOHN'S COMMUNITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • FRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +11%
  • CP
    COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

2
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
3
Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra Inc

Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
4
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

5
Milwaukee Ballet Company Inc

Milwaukee ballet transforms lives and connects communities through inspiring performance, community engagement, education and training.

Arts & Culture
6
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
7
Milwaukee Youth Arts Center Inc

To provide the finest collaborative environment for: supporting performing arts training and education for a diverse population of youth; nurturing youth from diverse ethnic, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds, instilling life-skills…

Arts & Culture
8
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
9
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
10
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
11
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
12
Milwaukee World Festival Inc

The corporation shall be a civic organization not organized for profit but operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes including in furtherance thereof, the production of an annual festival in the milwaukee metropolitan…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Villa Terrace Museum and Gardens Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%7%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr15%31%35–55yr20%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%5%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr18%9%20–35yr15%9%35–55yr20%77%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
12%
710/5,757

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,240,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $320,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INCMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $156,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INCMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $153,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INCHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc — $150,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee IncUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $104,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $130,000 · Arts & Culture+8 moreTULAROSA HIGH SCHOOL — $240,000 · OtherTULAROSA HIGH SC…STEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC — $150,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONES …UNITED PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $30,000 · OtherUNITED PERFORMIN…+9 more — $66,000 · Other+9 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $250,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $54,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE …PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $91,000 · HealthHEPATITIS B FOUNDATION — $41,000 · HealthALVERNO COLLEGE — $60,000 · EducationMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER — $50,000 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationSILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesSAINT JOHN'S COMMUNITIES INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC — $3,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$2,253,500Other$486,000Philanthropy$304,000Health$132,000Education$112,000Human Services$60,000Youth Development$25,000Environment$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,240,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $320,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $250,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $156,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $153,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $104,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $91,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPRESENT MUSIC INC — $72,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $54,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER — $50,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHEPATITIS B FOUNDATION — $41,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT ACT THEATRE INC — $24,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S COMMUNITIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE JAZZ INSTITUTE INC — $11,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLY MUSIC INC — $4,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetVILLA TERRACE MUSEUM AND GARDENS LTD — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI35.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Baird Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Gardner Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laskin Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laskin Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Laskin Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph