Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

GOODS FOR GOOD

GOODS FOR GOOD (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $232,585 to it, the largest being The Washington Home Inc ($102,500). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$541k
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$233k
Net assets
$410k
7/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 20%
01What it does

What Goods for Good does

Mission

Goods For Good's (G4G) mission is to strengthen communities through collective acts of kindness. We provide critical care and goods to underserved and vulnerable neighbors in the Washington, D.C. area, partnering with local nonprofits and volunteers to amplify our impact.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Essentials: Projects in this category are goods and services that focus on essential items critical to basic living. Included in this category are clothing, meals and groceries, special needs, furniture and household items, and more.

    $192,617 spent
    61% of program spending
  2. Wellness: Projects in this category are goods and services that focus on the overall physical and mental health of individuals. Included in this category are health supplies, fans for underserved seniors, filled diaper bags for low-income moms, and toiletries for those in need.

    $39,800 spent
    13% of program spending
  3. Enrichment: Projects in this category focus on ways Goods for Good can bring happiness by pushing back isolation, loneliness, and depression often caused by the impacts of poverty. Included in this category are care bags, holiday boxes, cards, and more.

    $82,097 spent
    26% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $314,514.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($266k) Expenses 100 ($226k) Net assets 100 ($66k)2023 Revenue 114 ($305k) Expenses 100 ($225k) Net assets 237 ($155k)2024 Revenue 131 ($348k) Expenses 132 ($298k) Net assets 320 ($210k)2025 Revenue 203 ($541k) Expenses 154 ($348k) Net assets 625 ($410k)
2022202320242025
Revenue (203)Expenses (154)Net assets (625)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $228k to $420k (+84%).

$78k
$169k
$228k
$420k
2022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 6% · 2023 0% · 2024 0% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of GOODS FOR GOOD’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,828 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$40k
’22
$80k
’23
$50k
’24
$193k
’25
14
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

elizabeth workman

Executive Director

Board chair

maria nagorski

chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

2022202320242025
Listed4424
Joined·+0··
No longer listed·0··
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $4k → $60k.

6 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 46% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GOODS FOR GOOD’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GOODS FOR GOOD leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

90% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GOODS FOR GOOD.

44%
largest funder
81%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 71% · 2023 55% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

81% of GOODS FOR GOOD's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.

IL
MD
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $107k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GOODS FOR GOOD runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,237 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Operating margin36% · top quartile
Months of reserve13.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)27% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,237 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like GOODS FOR GOOD

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 7%Fundraising 3%

Governance

4
board members
75%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GOODS FOR GOOD: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GOODS FOR GOOD?
GOODS FOR GOOD (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $232,585 to it, the largest being The Washington Home Inc ($102,500). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GOODS FOR GOOD have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $232,585 in grants to GOODS FOR GOOD, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GOODS FOR GOOD?
The Washington Home Inc is the largest funder on record, with $102,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GOODS FOR GOOD find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Goods for Good →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing