Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF

GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF (Colorado) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $516,688 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($401,342). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$317k
Funders on record
11
Grants received
$517k
Net assets
$0
6/11 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 33%
01What it does

What Global Orphan Relief does

Mission

To provide loving support for orphaned children, fostering a greater capacity for physical, spiritual, and emotional healing and growth, and deploying the local church to do the same.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. HOME-BASED CARE INITIATIVE - We finished the year providing care for 199 orphan children. We served 45 children at the House of Faith, House of Hope and our Kalomo Home in Zambia, 50 children in widow-led households in Homabay and Meru Kenya, we served 39 orphaned children via our Orphans and Widows partnership with Bethel Church of Pakistan, and lastly, we served 65 orphan children in widow-led households in Sekota, Ethiopia . We accomplish this work in each country with care/aid being distributed by our local field partners in a home/family setting. In 2025, we also provided complete care to children who lived in one of our homes, and for the children we serve through foster care, as they stay with extended families. We assisted with providing whatever the family might need to keep the child in their home. The number of children served in this initiative increased by 13 children or 7 year over year.

    $84,762 spent$47,679 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  2. NUTRITION INITIATIVE - In 2025, we provided an estimated 447,770 meals at schools and extended families to benefit orphan children in Ethiopia, Kenya, Pakistan, and South Sudan. During the year, we were able to provide food aid to as many as 1,978 orphan children. There was no growth in this initiative over 2024 as we simply maintained our current Mission Projects that distributed food aid with slightly fewer children.

    $106,009 spent$21,228 earned by the program
    38% of program spending
  3. EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIP - We partner with local area schools in Kenya and Zambia that empower orphan children to attend school and continue their education. We partnered with sixteen schools in 2025 that provided education to 485 orphan children in Kenya and Zambia. Most of these children would not attend school if not for our scholarships. These scholarships are awarded on financial need and the parental status of the child. We decreased the number of scholarships granted by 18 in 2025 versus 2024.

    $22,317 spent$4,584 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  4. Program Service Expenses 49,772, Grants and allocations 0, Revenue 15,469 CHURCH MOBILIZATION INITIATIVE-We continued to invest in the process of deploying local ministry leaders to serve orphan children in their communities. This deployment in initiated through one-day Great Commandment Workshops, where we encourage the local church to care for orphan children. We ended 2025 with 3,994 GO Ambassadors who are providing some level of care to 14,744 orphan children in Africa and Asia. In addition, 474 GO Ambassadors hosted 1,080 orphan children in their own homes in 2025. Program Service Expenses 19,523, Grants and allocations 0, Revenue 19,000 CAPITAL PROJECTS - In 2025, we continued investing in school infrastructure in South Sudan. This included borehole repairs and the construction of a Water Yard in Aweil Town where we invested 19,000.

    $69,295 spent$34,469 earned by the program
    25% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $282,383.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($282k) Expenses 100 ($214k) Net assets 100 ($141k)2021 Revenue 115 ($324k) Expenses 160 ($344k) Net assets 86 ($122k)2022 Revenue 110 ($309k) Expenses 160 ($342k) Net assets 63 ($90k)2023 Revenue 122 ($344k) Expenses 164 ($350k) Net assets 59 ($83k)2024 Revenue 119 ($336k) Expenses 166 ($355k) Net assets 45 ($63k)2025 Revenue 112 ($317k) Expenses 141 ($301k) Net assets 0 ($0)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (112)Expenses (141)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $63k to $0 (−100%).

$141k
$122k
$90k
$83k
$63k
$0
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$68k
’20
−$19k
’21
−$33k
’22
−$7k
’23
−$20k
’24
$15k
’25
2.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Scott A Nordstrom

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020212022202320242025
Listed577776
Joined·+2+0+1+0+1
No longer listed·00102
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 4 funders, grant income fell $53k → $34k.

6 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 99% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF.

78%
largest funder
94%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 47% · 2018 79% · 2019 99% · 2020 95% · 2021 100% · 2022 81% · 2023 97% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

29% of GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

99% of GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $7k that is directly attributable, 80% of it comes from funders outside Colorado, across 4 states.

MA
CO
NC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’22
’23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $509k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CO

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF?
GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF (Colorado) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $516,688 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($401,342). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF have?
IRS filings report 11 organizations giving $516,688 in grants to GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $401,342 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GLOBAL ORPHAN RELIEF find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Global Orphan Relief →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing