Loading…
Loading…
Idaho · Nonprofit
FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM (Idaho) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $191,942 in grants to it, the largest being TWIN FALLS HEALTH INITIATIVES TRUST ($90,383). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM's revenue grew 49% between 2018 and 2025.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 513 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
81% of FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (93% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$7k from 1 funders in 2022, up from $91k and 3 in 2017.
2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 7 funders by total. Association, not causation.
FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 47% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 75% · 2018 60% · 2019 68% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM is locally rooted: 64% of its grant income comes from Idaho funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
63% of spending goes to programs.
90%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing