How much did KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY grant in FY2024?

KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY reported 22 grants totaling $1,716,473 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY based?

KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY is based in IN.

KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY

The administration of local chapters.

$1.7M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$980k

Largest

01What you fund

0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2024.

Education$1.5MCivil Rights$555kCrime & Legal$179kHuman Services$136kHealth$47kCommunity Improvement$12kYouth Development$8kOther$110k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2023

safetyjusticeprofessionalvoicecourt childrentrainingcourt proceedings

2024

jurisdictioncourt systemsupervise volunteersadvocate abusedabused childrencasa galchild

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $58k
$10k–50k12 grants · $271k
$50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$250k+1 grant · $980k

$18,608

Median grant

States reached

$16M

Total assets

Largest grants

KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION$980,136
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY$54,823
BOULDER VOICES FOR CHILDREN$40,614
MONROE COUNTY CASA$28,142
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$26,990
CASA OF MCLENNAN & HILL COUNTIES$25,284
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$24,405
SEMINOLE COUNTY FRIENDS OF ABUSED CHILDREN INC$24,401
CHILD ADVOCATES II$20,546
NATIONAL CASA ASSOCIATION$20,011
CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS$18,608
ONE LOVE FOUNDATION$16,558
CAPITAL AREA CASA ASSOCIATION$15,064
CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY$10,152
LEE COUNTY CASA$9,531

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 14 repeat orgs$422k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$336k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%

+46%

Still filing today

100%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KA
KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +73%
CO
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY
2× · 2023–2024 · $155k · revenue +61%
BV
BOULDER VOICES FOR CHILDREN
2× · 2023–2024 · $72k · revenue +210%

Funded once

CO
CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $37k · revenue +39%
CC
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY CASAgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $29k · revenue +201%
SH
SCOTTYS HOUSEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +194%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Court Appointed Special Advocates of

Purpose of casa is to advocate for the best interest of the vulnerable children in foster care. these children have been removed from their homes due to a substantiated case of abuse and neglect.

Crime & Legal

Court Appointed Special Advocates Casa

Casa provides trained, court-appointed volunteers to serve as advocates for the best interests of abused and neglected children in liberty and chambers counties of texas.

Human Services

Court Appointed Special Advocates

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates

Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights

Central Georgia Casa Inc

Court appointed advocates for juveniles

Civil Rights

Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal

Court Appointed Special Advocates of

Casa recruits, trains,and supervises adult volunteers who are appointed by a juvenile court judge to speak for the best interest of the child and help find the child a safe permanent home. with a casa volunteer, a child is half as likely…

Civil Rights

Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Advocates for Children

Provide specially-trained volunteers, who are appointed by the courts to represent the best interests of abused and neglected children in court proceedings.

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocates of

Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Bastrop Count

The organization recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who provide advocacy services to child victims removed by the state from homes because of abuse or neglect

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocates

To provide trained community volunteers, to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children, and to promote community awareness about child abuse issues.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the South Plains Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Clubs of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/44

the rest of the field

3,688/41,951

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

43/44

Grantees still filing

35/44

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$1,545,204Civil Rights$554,790Crime & Legal$178,798Human Services$135,810Other$109,532Health$46,736Community Improvement$11,672Youth Development$7,644

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Court Appointed SpecialWA53.8× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Court Appointed Special · Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation · Dutch Bros Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Texas Casa Inc · Ticket to Dream Foundation · The Allstate Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHILD ADVOCATES II.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 592928659 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CHILD ADVOCATES II, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity?

Find your warmest path to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity?

More from the funding graph

KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity?

More from the funding graph