· Public charity
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc
To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $340k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $616k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY | $196,894 |
| TULSA CASA | $90,505 |
| SAN BOIS CASA | $79,660 |
| CASA FOR CHILDREN INC | $72,159 |
| CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA | $64,086 |
| CHILD ADVOCATES NE OK (TRI-COUNTY) | $59,733 |
| CASA OF WESTERN OK (MULTI-CO YOUTH) | $52,873 |
| CANADIAN COUNTY CASA | $49,948 |
| FOURTH JD CASA (GARFIELD CO) | $48,408 |
| CASA FOR KIDS | $46,733 |
| CASA OF SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA | $40,628 |
| OKMULGEE COUNTY FAM RESOURCE CTR | $38,319 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION INC | $36,700 |
| CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN | $35,571 |
| 22ND JUDICIAL DIST CASA | $30,626 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +6%
- MYMulti-County Youth & Family Services Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $582k · revenue +15%
- SBSAN BOIS CASA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $485k · revenue +25% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child Advocacy Services
To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.
None
Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.
Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.
Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.
The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.
The organization's mission is to supervise volunteers primarily to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children and support the needs of the children served.
To provide the court with objective information regarding the status of children involved in abuse or neglect cases. Duties of the appointed advocate would include gathering information, developing recommendations, and providing written…
The program provides trained community volunteers to serve as court appointed social advocates for abused and neglected children involved in court proceedings.
To recruit, train and supervise community volunteers to advocate for children/youth who have experienced abuse and/or neglect who are within the legal jurisdiction of the state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Northeast Oklahoma Inc and the most unlike its peers is Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA CASA INC ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds South Central CASA of Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA OF NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds SAN BOIS CASA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds OKMULGEE COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE CTR ↗
- Who funds GARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN COUNTY CASA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CASA of Southwest Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds 22nd Judicial District CASA Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE COUNTYCHEROKEE NATION COURT APPOINTED SP ↗
- Who funds COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERN OKLAHOMA YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma Bar Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Casa Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Community Action Program Inc — 62% of income from government
- Lift Community Action Agency Inc — 43% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.