Texas · Nonprofit
EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN
EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN (Texas) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $194,874 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($89,107). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 76% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 10,885 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,885 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2022
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Capital for Kidsshared funders
- Womens Wayportfolio match
- Goldsmith Legacy Foundationportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $7k → $31.
5 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 76% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 9 of 10 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 97% · 2020 58% · 2021 41% · 2022 51% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
60% of EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
76% of EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $47k that is directly attributable, 98% of it comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $148k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 10 funders put you under-funded among the 383 organizations that share them.
- Capital for Kidsshared fundersTX · backs 29 organizations that share your funders
- Womens Wayportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Goldsmith Legacy Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- G Andrew Franz Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- A New Way of Life Reentry Projectportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mary's Penceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kengena Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Role Model Movement Inc (NFP)portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Movement Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Black Belt Community Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- NeighborShare Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN?
- EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN (Texas) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $194,874 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($89,107). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 76% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN have?
- IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $194,874 in grants to EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN?
- Network for Good is the largest funder on record, with $89,107 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like EXPONENTIAL POWER OF WOMEN find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2022–2022), and the filings of 10funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing