Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Child and Family Policy Institute of California

Child and Family Policy Institute of California (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $40,800 to it, the largest being National Center for Youth Law ($30,800). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$6.7M
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$41k
Net assets
$2.4M
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Child and Family Policy Institute of California does

Mission

To advance the development of sound public policy and promote excellence in county Human Services Agengies through research, education, training and technical assistance.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Safe and Thriving Futures (STF)- Supported the safety, permanency, and well-being of children in the child welfare system and transitioning from foster care through a number of strategies, including the development of a Core Child Welfare Practice Model, supporting a Youth Engagement Program, facilitating a statewide expert panel evaluating the effective use of psychotropic medications in the foster care system, supporting the statewide implementation of the Resource Family Approval program, and supporting the California Partners for Permanency.

    $2,657,202 spent$35,135 earned by the program
    45% of program spending
  2. Capacity Building & System Integration (CBSI) - Supported AB 2083 Children, Youth & Families System of Care (CYFSOC) leadership by helping them advance their partnerships across all child and family serving systems, at every level. The goals of CBSI are to enhance the care continuum for children and youth, and particularly those with complex care needs and who are involved in multiple systems. CBSI success will not only ensure that youth involved in multiple systems receive the robust support they need, but it will also enhance the capacity of interagency AB 2083 CYFSOC teams to support all children and youth, no matter the point at which those families are engaged. During FY 24/25, CBSI assisted 754 partners advance their program goals and five core strategies, as well as provided 85 hours of technical assistance.

    $1,031,412 spent$1,193,227 earned by the program
    17% of program spending
  3. Adult Services: two projects to coordinate and support strengthening of statewideworkforce development for Adult Services. Efforts include a coaching program pilot for new APS Supervisors in the Bay/Central Regions, two statewide Convenings,developing a coaching program for new Adult Services Directors, developing a three year strategic work plan for the CWDA Adults Committee, assemble eight strategic work plan committees, and build

    $635,646 spent$69,675 earned by the program
    11% of program spending
  4. California Preventing and Addressing Child Trafficking (PACT): facilitates coordination across 46 counties and offers local leaders access to critical resources, customized training, and coaching support improving services to youth at risk of or experiencing commercial sexual exploitation and/or labor trafficking. A diverse team of staff and consultants with subject matter expertise and lived experience are critical guides to inform our work. During FY 24/25, PACT consulted with 9 lived and professional experts, and provided over 1157 hours of customized technical assistance, and trained over 1562 people.

    $497,313 spent$825 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  5. Held the Foster Youth Education Summit, a conference with sessions to support the educational needs of foster children and youth from early childhood through college and career.

    $426,785 spent$520,122 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  6. Efforts to Outcomes and other programs.

    $390,310 spent$95,073 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  7. Family First Prevention Services (FFPS)- Coordinated and convened the FFPS Advisory Committee, its subcommittees, and relevant work groups to develop recommendations for CDSS in administering the FFPS Program, as well as providing technical assistance to the state, counties, and Tribes.

    $256,858 spent
    4% of program spending

The 7 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $5,895,526.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.1M) Expenses 100 ($3.1M) Net assets 100 ($1.0M)2018 Revenue 114 ($3.5M) Expenses 110 ($3.4M) Net assets 117 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 134 ($4.2M) Expenses 131 ($4.0M) Net assets 131 ($1.4M)2020 Revenue 87 ($2.7M) Expenses 89 ($2.7M) Net assets 129 ($1.3M)2021 Revenue 92 ($2.9M) Expenses 92 ($2.8M) Net assets 134 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 126 ($3.9M) Expenses 123 ($3.7M) Net assets 152 ($1.6M)2023 Revenue 134 ($4.2M) Expenses 131 ($4.0M) Net assets 168 ($1.8M)2024 Revenue 215 ($6.7M) Expenses 212 ($6.5M) Net assets 190 ($2.0M)2025 Revenue 214 ($6.7M) Expenses 206 ($6.3M) Net assets 226 ($2.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (214)Expenses (206)Net assets (226)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $2.3M to $3.8M (+70%).

$1.6M
$1.9M
$2.0M
$1.6M
$1.7M
$2.2M
$2.3M
$3.8M
$3.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 1% · 2020 70% · 2021 87% · 2022 67% · 2023 68% · 2024 73% · 2025 66%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

71% of Child and Family Policy Institute of California’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$54k
’17
$178k
’18
$142k
’19
−$14k
’20
$47k
’21
$188k
’22
$171k
’23
$221k
’24
$382k
’25
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Juliet Cox

CEO

Board chair

Laura Hawkins

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed7779911151617
Joined·+0+0+3+1+3+7+1+2
No longer listed·00111301
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2018: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $31k → $10k.

Funder
'17
'18
total
$10k
funders
1
1

Left out of every figure on this page: $48k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Greater Horizons). These are real filings, and they are not money Child and Family Policy Institute of California raised.

From the IRS filings of Child and Family Policy Institute of California’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Child and Family Policy Institute of California leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Child and Family Policy Institute of California.

75%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Child and Family Policy Institute of California's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Child and Family Policy Institute of California runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve2.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Child and Family Policy Institute of California

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
90%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Child and Family Policy Institute of California: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Child and Family Policy Institute of California?
Child and Family Policy Institute of California (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $40,800 to it, the largest being National Center for Youth Law ($30,800). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Child and Family Policy Institute of California have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $40,800 in grants to Child and Family Policy Institute of California.
Who is the largest funder of Child and Family Policy Institute of California?
National Center for Youth Law is the largest funder on record, with $30,800 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Child and Family Policy Institute of California find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Child and Family Policy Institute of California →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing